Laserfiche WebLink
Deuel and Snyder Improvement Company Agenda Item 14a <br />March 10, 2009 (UPDATED March 18, 2009) <br />Page 3 of S <br />for diversions when these rights were put in place). The Meadow Rights have two separate <br />appropriations: Ap~ril 2, 1871 for 13 cfs and July 1, 1874 for 8 cfs. This water can only be diverted <br />between April l Ot and July l Oth, as defined in the decree. The traditional irrigation rights (which <br />can be used during the entire irrigation season) also have two appropriations: Apri17, 1884 for 32 <br />cfs and November 1, 1888 for 31 cfs. The Company and its shareholders also have a recharge plan <br />which was decreed in 2003 with the Company's plan for augnentation. The Company's average <br />annual diversion is 4,590 AF for all water diverted into the Canal. <br />Project Description <br />A range of alternatives to address the rehabilitation of the sand gate structure were considered, <br />including: 1) No action; 2) Rebuild the sand gate using a slide gate; 3) Rebuild the sand gate using a <br />radial gate; and 4) Replace 25 feet of the river diversion structure with a new bladder gate system. <br />Alternative 1- No Action: If the Company continues to operate with its current system, the danger <br />to its ditch personnel remains a concern; therefore, this option was not acceptable. <br />Alternative 2- Rebuild the sand gate using a slide gate: This alternative consists of replacing a <br />portion of the river diversion with a five foot slide gate. This alternative would create a platform <br />over the rollover wall. A slide gate of this size would likely require multiple personnel to operate. <br />The cost of this alternative is approximately $80,000. <br />Alternative 3- Rebuild the sand gate using a radial gate: This alternative consists of replacing a <br />portion of the diversion with a five foot wide radial gate. This alternative is identical to alternative <br />#2 except for the style of gate. The advantage of this alternative is that a radial gate can be operated <br />by one individual. The cost of this alternative is approximately $100,000. <br />Alternative 4- Replace 25 feet of the river diversion structure with a new bladder gate system: <br />This alternative consists of replacing a portion of the diversion with a 25 foot wide inflatable <br />bladder gate. This alternative will eliminate the safety concerns for personnel and increase the <br />ability to remove sand from the Company's point of diversion. The cost of this alternative is <br />approximately $250,000. <br />Selected Alternative: The Company has chosen Alternative 3 and will replace a five foot section of <br />the diversion structure with a radial gate, which will address the safety concerns and allow the <br />Company to more easily operate the gate. <br />The Project design is expected to be completed in March 2009. Construction is anticipated to take <br />place in the fall of 2009. <br />