My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150289 feas study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
C150289 feas study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2010 4:59:12 PM
Creation date
4/1/2009 3:44:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150289
Contractor Name
South Metro Water Supply Authority
Contract Type
Loan
County
Adams
Arapahoe
Douglas
Arapahoe
Douglas
Denver
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
493
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Stonegate Village Metropolitan District <br />NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS <br />December 31, 2006 <br />Note 1: Summaiv of Significant Accounting Policies <br />A. Definition of reporting enti <br />Stonegate Village Metropolitan Distinct (the District), aquasi-municipal corporation, was <br />organized on July 20, 1983 and is governed pursuant to provisions of the Colorado Special <br />District Act. The District's service area is located in Douglas County, Colorado. The <br />District provides construction of arterial streets and landscaping, installation of storm <br />drainage facilities, water and sanitation supply and distribution facilities, construction and <br />maintenance of recreation facilities, parks and trails. <br />Effective as of November 30, 1996, as a result of the Second Amended and Restated <br />Regional Facilities Construction Agreement dated November 22, 1996 with Lincoln Park <br />Metropolitan District, the operation and ownership of the Water and Sewer Funds was <br />conveyed to the District. The District currently provides water and sewer services to both <br />districts' properly service area. <br />The District has no employees and contracts for all of its management and professional <br />services. <br />The District follows the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) accounting <br />pronouncements which provide guidance for determining which governmental activities, <br />organizations and functions should be included within the financial reporting entity. <br />GASB pronouncements set forth the financial accountability of a govenunental <br />organization's elected governing body as the basic criterion for including a possible <br />component governmental organization in a primary government's legal entity. Financial <br />accountability includes, but is not limited to, appointment of a voting majority of the <br />organization's governing body, ability to impose its will on the organization, a potential for <br />the organization to provide specific financial benef is or burdens and fiscal dependency. <br />As of December 31, 2006, no component unit has been identified as reportable to the <br />District, nor is the District a component unit of any other primacy governmental entity. <br />The following is a summary of the more significant policies: <br />B. Basis of presentation <br />The government-wide financial statements (i.e. the statement of net assets and the <br />statement of activities) report information on all of the non-fiduciary activities of the <br />District. For the most part, the effect of interfund activity has been removed from these <br />statements. Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and <br />intergovernmental revenues, are reported separately from business-[y~e activities, which <br />rely to a significant extent on fees and charges for support. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.