Laserfiche WebLink
FIGURE 1 SPECIFIC PROBLEM ANALYSIS <br /> WORK FLOW DIAGRAM <br /> ACTIVITY <br /> SUBACTIVITY DESCRIPTION AND SEQUENCE RESULTS <br /> • MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT <br /> PHASE I DEVELOP PREIMPLEMENTATION PLAN PROCEDURES <br /> ACTIVITY 1 -- AND EXECUTE AGREEMENT PRODUCTS <br /> PREIMPLEMENTATION PARTICIPANTS <br /> (Nov. 1974-Jan. 1975) -SCHEDULES <br /> BUDGETS <br /> • SELECTED PARTICIPANTS <br /> PHASE II 2DEVELOP INITIAL 1 SELECT PARTICIPANTS <br /> ACTIVITY 1 -- PROBLEM AND • INITIAL PROBLEM AND ISSUES <br /> PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION ISSUES LIST F LIST (MAPS, FIGURES, NARRATIVE) <br /> (Feb. 1975-June 1.975) <br /> • TENTATIVELY DEFINED ANALYTICAL <br /> 3 DEFINE TENTATIVE CENTRAL AREAS (MAPS AND NARRATIVE) <br /> ANALYTICAL AREAS CASE <br /> • REGIONWIDE REACTION (MAPS, <br /> 4 OBTAIN REGIONWIDE FIGURES, AND NARRATIVE) <br /> REVIEW AND REACTION <br /> 0 PROBLEMS AND ISSUES <br /> • POSITION CONCERNING NATIONWIDE _ <br /> PHASE II MODIFIED REVIEW AND ANALYZE ANALYSIS <br /> ACTIVITY 2 -- CENTRAL ---- NATIONWIDE ANALYSIS <br /> SELECT STATE/REGIONAL _ CASE RESULTS STATE PREFERENCE FUTURE <br /> DESIRES AND OBJECTIVES, DESIRES AND GOALS <br /> SCREEN PROBLEMS AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC, LAND USE, <br /> DOCUMENT ASSUMPTIONS DEVELOP THE STATE AND WATER USE PROJECTIONS <br /> AND METHODOLOGIES PREFERENCE FUTURE ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODOL- <br /> (July 1975-Feb. 1976) OGIES (MAPS, FIGURES, <br /> NARRATIVE) <br /> DEVELOP THE REGIONAL - <br /> PREFERENCE FUTURE • FINAL RENCE <br /> FUTURE R(FIGURES EGIONAL PAND ENARRATIVE) <br /> REGIONWIDE REVIEW OF • DOCUMENTED DIFFERENCES <br /> IFF ERENCNTRAL ESABETWEEN <br /> THE REGIONAL PREFERENCE <br /> ND <br /> FUTURE REGIONAL PREFERENCE FUTURE <br /> (FIGURES AND NARRATIVE) <br /> : <br /> 11 REGROUP AND SCREEN <br /> 9 FINALIZE THE REGIONAL • FINAL PROBLEM AND ISSUES LISP <br /> PROBLEMS PREFERENCE FUTURE (MAPS, FIGURES, NARRATIVE) <br /> 12 DEVELOP FINAL 0 DOCUMENT DIFFERENCES <br /> BET14EEN MODIFIED SENTRAL <br /> PROBLEMS AND CASE AND REGI NAL - <br /> ISSUES LIST PREFERENCE FUTURE <br /> • PROBLEM EFFECTS INFORMATION <br /> PHASE II <br /> ACTIVITY 3 -- 13 DEVELOP EFFECTS (FIGURES AND NARRATIVE) <br /> DEVELOP INFORMATION INFORMATION FOR • POTENTIAL STUDY AND ANALYTICAL <br /> DESCRIBING SELECTED EACH PROBLEM AREAS (MAPS) <br /> PROBLEMS <br /> (March 1976-Aug. 1976) • STUDY AREA EFFECTS INFORMATION <br /> 14 DEFINE POTENTIAL 15 DEVELOP STUDY LEVEL B, SPECIAL, AREA EFFECTS FIGURES AND NARRATIVE) <br /> LEVEL C, AND INFORMATION <br /> IMPLEMENTATION • DOCUMENTED DIFFERENCES BETWEEN <br /> STUDY AREAS MODIFIED CENTRAL CASE AND <br /> EGIONAL PREFERENCE FUTURE . <br /> FIGURES AND NARRATIVESS <br /> • THE ROLE FOR RESOLVING <br /> 17 EVOLVE THE 16 DOCUMENT PROBLEMS <br /> STATE, FEDERAL, DIFFERERENCES <br /> AND PRIVATE ROLE BETWEEN MODIFIED • EVOLVE THE STATE AND FEDERAL <br /> FOR RESOLVING PROBLEMS CENTRAL CASE AND ROLE FOR RESOLVING THE <br /> REGIONAL PREFERENCE PROBLEMS (NARRATIVE AND <br /> y _ FUTURE FIGURES) - ------ - <br /> Et <br /> t <br /> -- --CaYC�� ;SIOi�� APED-RECOhiMEN17ATI0ivS_— <br /> PHASE II 18 DEVELOP CONCLUSIONS <br /> ACTIVITY 4 -- • PRIORITIES (NARRATIVE AND <br /> STATE/REGIONAL AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> PRIORITIES, DEVELOP FIGURES) <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND 19 ESTABLISH PRIORITIES • REGIONWIDE REVIEW (COMMENTS) <br /> PREPARE THE STATE/ 20 <br /> REGIONAL REPORT PREPARE THE STATE/ • FINAL SPECIFIC PROBLEM <br /> (Sept. 1976-Dec. 1976) REGIONAL REPORT ANALYSIS REPORT (MAPS, FIGURES.. <br /> . �r AND ,NARRATIVE) <br /> 22 FINALIZE SPECIFIC 21 REGIONWID7ERE VIEW OF <br /> PROBLEM ANALYSIS THE STATE/REGIONAL <br /> REPORT REPORT <br /> a OFFICIAL COMMENTS <br /> PHASE III <br /> ACTIVITY 1 -- 1 REVIEW AND COMMENT <br /> REGIONAL REVIEW OF ON THE NATIONAL <br /> NATIONAL REPORT REPORT <br /> (Jan. 1977-Sept. 1977) <br />