Laserfiche WebLink
_~ <br />decision not to file a statement of opposition under this Rule does not constitute: (1) <br />acceptance b~- the C~'~-CB of injure- to and- potentially affected instream flog{- «ater right; <br />or (~ - a «-ai~~er of the C«TCB~s right to place an administrati~-e call for any- instream flo«- <br />«-ater right. Rule 8z.(1=~ sets forth «-hat t~-pe of notice the C~~-CB «-ill pro~-ide to t~-ater <br />court applicants and to the Di~-ision Engineer «-hen it elects not to file a statement of <br />opposition to a «-ater court application under this Rule. <br />Finally-. in ~'0~:19_ the Board amended Rule 8i.(~) (Injury- _~ccepted «-ith <br />Mitigation) to prop-ide notice to «-ater users of: (1 j the information they- must submit to <br />the C~~-CB «-hen requesting that the C~~TCB enter into a pretrial resolution under «-hich it <br />«ill accept injury- «-ith mitigation. (__' the factors the C~~-CB ~t-ill consider in e~-aluating <br />an injury- «-ith mitigation proposal; and (~ j the terms and conditions the C~~'CB «-ill <br />require in decrees incol-porating injury- «-ith mitigation. <br />In general_ it is the polio- of the C~{-CB to consider illj urn- ~~ ith mitigation <br />proposals only- «-hen no other reasonable «-ater supply- alternati~-es can be implemented. <br />Elc`pti~~ns to the polio- mad- be granted «-hen the proponent can demonstrate that the <br />proposed mitigation «-ill result in significant and permanent enhancements to the natural <br />zn~-irc-nn~`nt ofthz su~ect stream or lake e~istinQ at thz timz thz ~~roponent proposes the <br />inju.-~- «-it_h ?Z~iti~ation. <br />