Administrative Record 1-11

• Year: 2009
• Instream Flow Rules - Doc Type: Rulemaking Hearings

Linda Bassi
Ju1~- 7, ?008
Page 2
intent «-as to allo«- small users to put «-ater to beneficial use. «~hile still protecting 99 percent of
the instream flog;- priority-, this can still be accomplished. If selective subordination is the issue.
~i`hy couldn°t the C~'~"CB a~ee to call onl~~ for 99 percent of its decreed amount? This «~ould
protect other non-De Minimus ~;-ater rights and allo«° the «~ater for the small users to sti 11 be
de~-eloped. Others;~ise. as I stated previously, if the C~'~~CB calls out small De 'Vlinimus «~ater
users. there is really no purpose for a De Minimus finding in decrees anymore. and the entire rule
is probable meaningless.
Thank you for allo«~ing me to present the concerns of the Middle Park Water Conservancy
District. «~e «=ould be glad to meet with you and other members of the C~'~~ CB to discuss this
matter further if that «-ould be helpful.
e'en- truly- -ours.
BISHOP-BROGDEN ASSOCIATES, I?vC.
Michael A. Sa~-1er. P.E.
8036.00
cc: Stan Cazier
enclosure
LJ