Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.....~......~-"~ <br /> <br />e LIST OF TABLES <br /> Table Page <br /> 1 Location, classification, and category of <br /> streams selected for study . . . . . . . . . . 3 <br /> 2 Cross sectional evaluations, dates completed, <br /> average flows and range of flows . . . . . . . 4 <br /> 3 Key flow parameters used to determine minimum <br /> flow requirements using the R-2 Cross Single <br /> Transect Hethod . . . . . . . 6 <br /> 3-A Key flow parameters used to determine m1n1mum <br /> flow requirements for the multiple transect <br /> R-2 Cross and IFG4 methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 <br /> 4 Minimum flow recommendations using the Single <br /> Transect (R-2 Cross) Hethod . . . . . 10 <br /> 5 Minimum flow recommendation using the Multiple <br /> Transect (R-2 Cross) Method . . . . 12 <br />e 6 Hinimum flow determinations using the <br /> Incremental (IFG4) Method . . . . . . . . 16 <br /> 7 Hinimum flows (cfs) derived by the <br /> Montana Method . . . . . . . . . . 20 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Minimum flow recommendations by four dif- <br />ferent methods expressed as percent average <br /> <br />flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />Predicted weighted usable area in ratios for <br />indiviQual species 'IS actual species composition <br />(perce~t) in the stream . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />Comparison of the minimum flow recommendations <br />generated using four different methodologies <br /> <br />26 <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />Comparison of multiple R-2 Cross and IFG4 <br />methodologies for average depth and average <br />velocity predictions . . . . . . . <br /> <br />27 <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />Comparison or the reliability of the Single <br />Transect R-2 Cross and IFG~ methods for pre- <br />dicting field velocity measurements . . . . . <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />Comparison of the R-2 Cross and IFG4 methods <br />for relative accuracy in predic~ing field <br />measured velocities . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br />iii <br />