Laserfiche WebLink
regional management approach to the problem was essential to finding a solution. <br />The PPACG Boazd of Directors decided to create a public forum for continuing work on the <br />Fountain Creek Watershed Project. The PPACG formed the Fountain Creek Watershed Forum <br />(FCWF) in conjunction with the Pueblo Area Council of Governments (PACOG). Elected <br />afficials from the PPACG and PACOG provide the leadership and form the Policy Development <br />Committee. The technical staf~ from cities and counties and other interested agencies and <br />affected parties form the Fountain Creek Watershed Forum Technical Advisory Committee <br />(FCWFTAC). The FCWFTAC has been meeting since November 1998. At the advice of the <br />FCWFTAC, the FCWF began explori.ng the possibility of securirig another grant from the EPA. <br />The grant will be used to generate a comprehensive, regional watershed management plan. <br />In conjunction with this proposed EPA funded study effort, the FCWF has expressed interest in <br />pursuing a Feasibility Study by the Corps of Engineers through re-activation of an existing study <br />authority. As a result of the Apri129, 1999 flood, many affected parties along Fountain Creek <br />were able to obtain immediate streambank erosion protection through the Natural Resources <br />Conservation Service (NRCS). The NRCS Emergency Watershed Protection pro~am allows <br />restoration and protection of streambanks threatening private and public interests. Nevertheless, <br />the overall challenge for the FCWF is enormous in scope and will likely require a cambined <br />effort on the part of the Corps of Engineers, local government agencies ana other Federal <br />agencies. <br />In anticipation of a concerted regional effort, the City of Colorado Springs, El Paso County, City <br />of Pueblo and Pueblo County are working toward a regional stormwater services project to <br />develop the organizational, operational, legal, and financial framework of a regional stormwater <br />and flood control organization. This may ultimately evolve into an entity which can sponsor a <br />comprehensive, basin-wide, Federally cost shazed floocl control improvement project. <br />Arkan~as Itiver <br />Development within the Arkansas basin downstream of Pueblo has not been as significant as the <br />development along the Fountain Creek and tributaries. The increased flow and associated <br />erosion and sediment transport from Fountain Creek has created aggradation within the Arkansas <br />River channel. This aggradatian and increase in base stream flow has resulted in increased <br />flooding from flows that occur at relatively frequent intervals. This appeazs to be largely the case <br />at La Junta, Colorado. Local officials report that the Arkansas River channel bed in La Junta has <br />increased in elevation 16 feet over the last 30 yeazs. <br />Aggradation in the river channel has become problematic from the standpoint of local <br />stormwater drainage. In 1993, the Corps of Engineers conducted a hydrologic investigation for <br />La Junta as part of an initial appraisal for a Section 205 Small Flood Control Project. The <br />investigation was focused on the First Street Stormdrain between the King and Anderson <br />Arroyos. The drainage azea and flow quantity were below the policy threshold for Corps of <br />Engineers projects, but it was clear that sedimentation has adversely affected drainage to enter <br />Chapter 5- Flood Risk Assessment <br />Post Flood Assessment Report 36 Draft Revisef109/09/99 <br />