Laserfiche WebLink
INTRODUCTION <br />As diecuased with Mr. Uon Soards on October 25, 1987, the U. S. <br />Army Corpe of Engineere, Albuquerque Dietrict, is developing a <br />realtime flood warning system for Colorado Springs and Manitou <br />Springa, Colorado. Drainage baeins whoae etreame flow through these <br />communitieB heve been identified. A general area map is shown in <br />Figure 1. Rainfall gages have been inetalled in these b~sins that <br />relay rainfall amounta and in con~unction with a rainfall-runoff model <br />will provide warning ae to expected flood magnitude and timing. Mr. <br />5oarde, indicated that results from the report "Flood hydrology of <br />foathill and mountain streams in Colarado" (Jarrett, 1987), would be <br />used as an aid to design and develop the flood warning system. (This <br />report is preeently in review ae a U.S. Geological Surve~y professional <br />paper). Specifically the repart demonatratea that there is an upper <br />elevation limit for significant rainfall-runoff flooding of about <br />7,'S(~0 feet in Colorado. The~ etudy also indicated that below about <br />7,500 feet in Colorado streams are eub~ect to infrequent cataetrophic <br />flash tloode; whereas, above 7,SQ0 feet snowmelt flows predominate and <br />are generally within stream bank:s. Many reported "floode" above 7,500 <br />feet were actually debris flowe. The source of these flaeh floods is <br />intense cloudburst stormB that have been shown to be limited to emall <br />areaa. Some of the etreame that drain into Colorado Springs and <br />Manitou Springs originate up to elevations of 14,000 feet on Pikea <br />Peak. The Pike'a Peak Maasi.ve rises abruptly from the plains and <br />2looding may differ from other mountain areaB. Also, aite specific <br />paleohydrologic investigations r,ave not previoualy been done in theses <br />streams. Site specific inve,stiqations need to be done to determine if <br />elevation limits of eignificar~t reinfall differ from those developed <br />for the Arkanese River basin (.Iarrett, 1987>. These reaults can then <br />be used to determine the contri.buting drainage area in the new flood- <br />warning system. <br />Because of the importance of the flood-warning system, Robert <br />Jarrett conducted paleohydrolc~gic investigatione in the streams that <br />drain into the two communitiea on Hovember 7-8, 1987 to provide eite <br />epecific information for input into the deeign of the flood-warning <br />system. Since the flood-warninc~ syetem is being developed during this <br />winter season for use next year, onsite investigations were made prior <br />to snowfall t~at would cover stream channele for the winter. The <br />purpoae of these investigations were to (1> determine if the elevation <br />limit of 7,500 feet applies to ihese baains that drain off tt~e eastern <br />flank of Pikes Peak and (2~ roughly estimate the magnitude and <br />frequency of past floodiny ueing paleohydrologic techniques. <br />Subaequent to the paleoflood investigations a review of flooding <br />history and review of available streamflow-gaging etation records was <br />made. Two pointe need to be made (1) these identified paleofloods are <br />eatimateB at thiB time with an error eatimate o.f about 50 p~rcent and <br />the estimates of time o~E floods is approximate (detailed <br />paleohydrologic methods can improve the estimates of the number of <br />past floods, their magnitude, and age of occurrence) and (2) the <br />magnitude of floods variefa dramatically over ahort diatances <br />