Laserfiche WebLink
The expected yield of the Compact Compliance Pipeline is 15,000 a - eet per year, <br />which should be adequate to ensure compact compliance forth 0-year iod of <br />repayment of the CWCB loan. The North Fork Lease will reduce a consumptive use <br />charged by Colorado by approximately 2,500 acre-feet per year, which will reduce the <br />need to pump ground water from the Compact Compliance Pipeline, thereby extending <br />the life of the Compact Compliance Wells. <br />2.2. Water Rights <br />The water rights included in the Transaction are listed on the schedule attached to this <br />study as Attachment 5 which water rights, along with certain rights-of-way and <br />infrastructure are referred to in this study as the "Water Rights". The Transaction is <br />subject to YCWA PID's review of the surface owner's title to the Water Rights and rights <br />to convey the same and the grant by the surface owners of certain covenants to dry-up <br />the property on which the Water Rights were historically used. <br />The RRWCD WAE has leased a portion of the Water Rights in 2008, which <br />demonstrated the feasibility of leasing such water rights to reduce the consumptive use <br />charged to Colorado under the Republican River Compact Administration's accounting <br />procedures. <br />3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION <br />3.1. Purpose and Background of the North Fork Water Rights Purchase <br />The YCWA negotiated the terms of the proposed Transaction in June of 2008 in an <br />effort to settle the litigation that threatened to curtail over 1,300 irrigation wells in Yuma <br />County. All other agricultural communities in Colorado have faced surface water- <br />groundwaterdisputes, but in those cases the wells subject of curtailment were junior <br />wells administered in the priority system. The NHP Basin wells on the other hand were <br />designated basin wells operating pursuant to the terms of their state issued well <br />permits, which were supposed to be operating outside of the priority system and <br />therefore not subject to curtailment. <br />1. Well Regulation History <br />In 1965, the Colorado Ground Water Management Act was enacted, which <br />created the Colorado Ground Water Commission and allowed the Commission to <br />establish designated ground water basins. The Management Act applied a <br />modified doctrine of prior appropriation to designated ground water to permit the <br />full economic development of such ground water. <br />On May 13, 1966, the Ogallala Aquifer in the Republican River Basin in Colorado <br />was included in the Northern High Plains Designated Ground Water Basin. At <br />that time, there was limited well development in the NHP Basin. However, <br />improvements in center pivot sprinkler irrigation systems allowed the <br />development of land that was more difficult to irrigate with flood irrigation <br />methods, and approximately 4,000 final permits have been issued within the <br />12368\1 \1204400.5 3 <br />