Laserfiche WebLink
The Pueblo Chieti:ain Online :: F ers leery as state moves on water rules Page 1 of 3 <br />Your print and online news source for Southern Colorado <br />Monday, November 17, 2008 <br />Farmers leery as state moves or~ water rules Print Page <br />Officials trying to account for po ential impact of irrigation changes on return flows to' <br />Arkansas River. <br />By CHRIS WOOOKA <br />THE PUEBLO CIiIEFTAIN <br />November 16, 2008 11:25 pm <br />While the state is moving toward <br />meeting on the Arkansas River C <br />discussion. <br />Meanwhile, officials are scrambling <br />systems fed by ponds or other imps <br />states. <br />"When these rules go into effect, <br />that's saved will have to be retun <br />a committee looking at the new r <br />"They want to take us back to 1948 <br />heard of PAM (Polyacrylamide, use <br />The state wants to be proactive in ~ <br />agricultural efficiency, but needs to <br />"There's an internal clock ticking <br />indefinitely." <br />ing up with a set of surface irrigation rules to show Kansas by this year's <br />act, farmers are nowhere near comfortable with a draft after hours of <br />come up with a way to provide relief for farmers who pUt in sprinkler <br />sments after 1999, the last reckoning of Colorado wateri use by the two <br />will never see another canal lined or any improvements made. Anything <br />to the river, so what's the point?" Dale Mauch, a Lamar farmer, said after <br />met Thursday. <br />Mauch fumed. "In 1948, there was no Pueblo Reservoir. iThey never <br />to line canals). They used mud." <br />rules that both protect its compact interests while encouraging <br />," said Division 2 Engineer Steve Witte. "We can't put these off <br />Farmers have told the state at past eetings that the accounting systems used to calculate the loss of return <br />flows to the river should be offset by the leakage to canals and erosion to stream banks caused by "clear" <br />water from Pueblo Dam. <br />Rather than trying to gain water by <br />say they are simply trying to avoid <br />Sprinklers, the major on-farm improv <br />efficient way to apply water because <br />~ pipes in ditches, lining them with concrete or applyir1g PAM, farmers <br />g out the predominantly earthen ditches throughout the valley. <br />it targeted by the rules, have been added in many cases as a more <br />save on farm labor, farmers on the committee say. <br />Under some calculations suggested spy state staff, surface irrigation <br />sprinklers are shown to be as effcient as sprinklers fed by wells. Farmers who use both say that is simply not <br />http://www.chieftain.com/articles/2,008/11 / 17/news/locaUdoc4921081 b4bd 1669644920$.... 11 / 18/2008 <br />