My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11d (2)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
11d (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:34:35 PM
Creation date
11/13/2008 9:38:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
11/18/2008
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
INSTREAM FLOW COUNCIL 2008 CONFERENCE: In early October 2008, Linda Bassi and <br />Jeff Baessler of the Stream and Lake Protection Section attended the Instream Flow Council's "FLOW <br />2008 -Interdisciplinary Solutions to Instream Flow Problems" conference in San Antonio, Texas. Over <br />300 people attended the conference, including federal, state, and local governmental employees, <br />consultants, academics, staff of regulated entities such as utilities, and staff ofnon-profit organizations. <br />The conference focused on Instream flow related issues, obstacles, and possible solutions using a <br />mediated, consensus building framework. Presentations addressed current scientific issues related to <br />Instream flow quantification and case histories that illustrated common issues and successful resolution of <br />conflicts. Most of the time was spent in small group discussions of targeted issues, exploring obstacles <br />and possible resolution. Group input was recorded and collected, synthesized by a facilitation team, and <br />provided back to groups for further consideration in subsequent sessions. In addition to updates on <br />scientific advances and negotiation techniques, the conference was a great opportunity to learn about <br />other states' Instream flow programs' challenges and successes, and to connect with individuals working <br />on issues similar to those we face in Colorado. (Linda Bassi) <br />NAVAJO-GALLUP WATER SUPPLY PROJECT & NAVAJO SETTLEMENT <br />UPDATE: The Omnibus Public Land Management Act, which contains the Navajo Indian Water Rights <br />settlement bill and authorizes the Navajo-Gallup Pipeline we believe, will be scheduled for floor debate in <br />the Senate during the week of November 17th. There is now a modified version of the omnibus package <br />in which 50+ bills were added to those already contained in S. 3213. We have been working with the <br />Colorado Attorney General's Office, the State of New Mexico and our respective Congressional <br />Delegations on the development of a colloquy for the Senator's to have the 7-Colorado River Basin States <br />letter concerning the Navajo Settlement and the Navajo-Gallup Water Supply Project put into the <br />legislative record. Our delegations believe there is still a chance to get the Omnibus Public Land <br />Management Act passed through the Senate before the next Congress convenes. (Randy Seaholm) <br />M0IVTANA v. WYDMINGIYELLOW ST ONE RIVER: On October 20, the U.S. Supreme Court <br />appointed attorney Barton H. Thompson to be the special master in Montana v. Wyoming-a water rights <br />dispute regarding the Yellowstone River Compact of 1950. The Compact outlines how Montana, North <br />Dakota, and Wyoming will divide water from the Tongue and Powder Rivers. In a complaint filed in <br />early 2007, Montana claims Wyoming has prevented it from receiving its share of water for a number of <br />reasons, including allowing the "construction and use of groundwater wells for irrigation" and the <br />"pumping of groundwater associated with coalbed methane production." The complaint also named <br />North Dakota as a party to the dispute because it is a signatory state to the Compact. Wyoming contends <br />that the Compact only applies to surface water and does not cover groundwater. (See WSW# 1707) <br />Wyoming had asked the Court to dismiss Montana's complaint. As special master, Mr. Thompson will <br />have broad powers and will be responsible for conducting the fact finding portion of the case by <br />summoning witnesses and issuing subpoenas. The Court's order also gives Mr. Thompson the <br />"...authority to fix the time and conditions for the filing of additional pleadings ... and to take such <br />evidence as maybe introduced...." Mr. Barton will also provide the Court with anon-binding <br />recommendation regarding the outcome of the case, which the states will debate in oral argument. Both <br />parties shall share Mr. Thompson's expenses. <br />r°~` 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.