My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
17all
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
17all
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:36:16 PM
Creation date
10/16/2008 9:01:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
7/22/2008
Description
ISF Section - Instream Flow Rules Revisions
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ISF Rule 8i.(3) – Injury With Mitigation July 12, 2008 Draft <br />(Changes to May 2008 Draft shown in bold) <br />right(s) in accordance with th e priority system or with <br />Colorado water law. <br />(h) At the first meeting of the two-meeting process required by <br />this Rule, staff will bring th e proposal to the Board for <br />preliminary consideration after completing its review of the <br />proposal and its consultation with DOW. Staff will work <br />with the proponent and interest ed parties to address any <br />preliminary concerns prior to bringing a proposal to the <br />Board. Preliminary consideration by the Board may result <br />in requests for more information or for changes to the <br />proposal. Staff will work with the proponent and interested <br />parties to finalize the proposal and bring it back to the <br />Board for final action at a subsequent Board meeting. <br />(g) (i) The Board will consider the following factors when <br />evaluating injury with mitigation proposals. Because injury <br />with mitigation proposals may involve unique factual <br />situations, the Board may cons ider additiona l factors in <br />specific cases. Further, evaluation of each injury with <br />mitigation proposal will require the exercise of professional <br />judgment regarding the specifi c facts of the proposal. <br />i Extent of the proposed injury: <br />1. Location of injury – affected stream(s) and length <br />of affected reach(es); <br />2. Amount, timing and frequency of shortages(s) to <br />the affected ISF water right(s); and <br />3. Potential impact to the natural environment of the <br />affected stream reach from such shortages. <br />ii Benefits of the mitigation to the natural <br />environment <br />iii The nature and extent of the benefits the mitigation <br />will provide to the existing natural environment of <br />the affected stream ; <br />iii iv The scientific justification for accepting the <br />mitigation ; and <br />v Whether the mitigation will enable the Board to <br />continue to preserve or improve the natural <br />environment of the subject stream to a reasonable <br />degree. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.