Laserfiche WebLink
Lower San Miguel yVa~er Resource Planning Study <br />Page 13 <br />The Tabeguache Well No.l, Tabeguache Well No. 2, and the Uravan Well No. 2 <br />are still in existence; however, the Uravan Well No. 2 is the only well that is <br />currently operable. Depending on the future use of the lands to be transferred to <br />Montrose County these wells may be useful under their decreed use. <br />Surface Water <br />Factors Considered <br />• The advantage to using the Johnson Ditch water rights as they are <br />currently decreed is that this could be done without going to water court <br />and addressing the history of use issue. <br />• Should this be possible the history of use could be re-established over <br />the next 100 years, or so, and the value of the water rights restored. <br />• One factor that makes this scenario infeasible is that the Club Ranch <br />where the Johnson Ditch rights were used is no longer available for <br />irrigation. The Club Ranch became the location for the mill's tailings <br />ponds and has since been reclaimed to a dry landlnatural vegetation type. <br />The application of irrigation water to these lands would defeat the <br />purpose of the reclamation effort. <br />• Another factor is the fact that not only has the mill where the water <br />rights were used been destroyed, but the Town of Uravan where the <br />water was also used has been razed as part of the remediation effort. <br />• Thus, there is no possible way to utilize the Johnson Ditch water rights <br />as currently decreed. <br />• If it were possible to use these water rights as decreed, the San Miguel <br />Basin could experience a senior call that it has not experienced for over <br />60 years. This could significantly alter the current water right <br />administration and historic use of water in the basin. <br />(rnnrl»cinnc <br />Since the lands where the Johnson Ditch water rights were originally used <br />are no longer available for irrigation or the other uses the water rights were <br />decreed for, placing the rights to their currently decreed use would not be feasible <br />even in light of the remote possibility of rejuvenating the water rights. <br />Power Company Canal Water Rights <br />Factors Considered <br />• The advantage to using the Miguel Power Company Canal water rights <br />as currently decreed is that this could be done without going to water <br />court and addressing the history of use issue. <br />• The hydropower facility for which the rights were used has long since <br />been destroyed. <br />• The cost to re-install such a generating facility would be very expensive <br />and the amount of power to be generated from such a low head facility <br />with limited supply would probably not justify the cost. <br />~Iuly 2008 <br />