Laserfiche WebLink
Lower San Miguel yVa~er Resource Planning Study <br />Page 3 <br />III. Background <br />The State of Colorado in 1983 filed suit in U.S. District Court against Union Carbide and <br />its subsidiaries under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability <br />Act (CERCLA) for the release of hazardous substances from its Uravan mill in western <br />Montrose County. Union Carbide in 1984 formed the Union Metals Corporation (Umetco) to <br />address the litigation and reclamation activities at the mill site. The litigation was resolved by the <br />entry of a consent decree in February of 1987. <br />III.A Consent Decree <br />The Consent Decree (Civil Action 83 -C-23 84) did a number of things including: 1) <br />establishing a Remedial Action Plan for reclamation of the Uravan site, 2) establishing the <br />Uravan Water Trust (Trust), 3) specifying the use of the "Johnson Ditch" water rights during the <br />reclamation process, 4) decreeing ownership of "Johnson Ditch" water rights to CWCB upon <br />completion of reclamation activities, and 5) conveying the title of the Miguel Power Company <br />Canal water right to the CWCB. It should be noted that the Miguel Power Company Canal water <br />right is separate and distinct from the Trust and the "Johnson Ditch" water rights. <br />III.B Uravan Water Trust <br />The Trust was responsible for the protection and use of the "Johnson Ditch" water rights <br />during the reclamation process. The trust was made up of two trustees, one from the State of <br />Colorado and one from Umetco. All actions of the trustees were to be unanimous, with any <br />disagreement going back to the court for resolution. The State trustee is currently Leo Large and <br />the Umetco trustee is Tom Gieck. <br />The Trust was to ensure the "Johnson Ditch" water rights were: 1) available for Umetco's <br />remediation efforts, 2) available for beneficial use of valid water right holders on the San Miguel <br />River who, in the joint determination of the Trustees, demonstrated that the milling operations, <br />disposal practices, or remedial activities at the Uravan facility had created water quality <br />conditions which materially impaired the ability of that user to put those rights to their decreed <br />use, and 3) conveyed to the CWCB when reclamation is completed. <br />III.C Memorandum of Understanding <br />Since the entry of the Consent Decree, the immediate upstream towns of Nucla and <br />Naturita and Montrose County (local governments) had expressed concern about the CWCB's <br />use and disposition of the Uravan Water Rights. To address this concern a Memorandum of <br />Understanding (MOU) was drafted and entered into by the towns of Nucla and Naturita, <br />Montrose County and the CWCB. The purpose of the MOU, which was signed in April of 1991, <br />was to alleviate the concerns which had been expressed by the local governments. The MOU <br />provided that: 1) CWCB utilize the Uravan Water Rights in accordance with its statutory powers <br />and duties, 2) CWCB fully and completely consult with the local governments regarding the use, <br />disposition, or abandonment of the Miguel Power Company Canal prior to taking any action <br />regarding that water right, 3) CWCB notify the local governments of the termination of the Trust <br />within 18o days of such termination, 4) CWCB agree not to sell, lease, grant, or otherwise <br />~Iuly 2008 <br />