My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
16 (6)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
16 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:35:54 PM
Creation date
10/2/2008 1:16:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/17/2008
Description
WPFM Section - Colorado Watershed Restoration Program Update
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Qualifications Evaluation (Maximum of 30 points) <br /> <br />This factor assesses how well the applicant fits the qualifications test: <br /> <br /> How diverse is the organization in terms of stakeholder participatio n and involvement? <br />(Maximum of 10 poin ts) <br /> <br /> <br />other community organizations and state and federal agencies? (Maximum of 10 points) <br /> <br /> What level of cash and in - kind match for the proposed project or planning e ffort can the <br />applicant organization provide? (Maximum of 10 points) <br /> <br /> <br />Organizational Capability (Maximum of 20 points) <br /> <br /> <br />proposed project or planning effort? (Maximum of 5 po ints) <br /> <br /> What level of staffing (volunteer or paid) does the applicant organization have available <br /> <br />for the proposed project or planning effort? (Maximum of 5 points) <br /> <br /> How capable is the available staff /contractor of accomplishing the proposed project o r <br />plan ning effort? (Maximum of 10 points) <br /> <br /> <br />Effectiveness of Proposal (50 points) <br /> <br /> If the proposed project or planning effort is implemented, will it have measurable results <br />that have a significant impact on improving the health of the watershed and/or protectin g <br />life and property from flood hazards? (Maximum of 20 points) <br /> <br /> Is the proposal well thought out and will the proposal implementation steps really <br />accomplish the stated goals of the proposal. (Maximum of 10 points) <br /> <br /> Is the proposed project or planning effo rt anticipated timeline realistic? (Maximum of 10 <br />points) <br /> <br /> Does the project or planning effort have multiple objectives (Maximum of 10 points) <br /> <br />I n addition, applications must be submitted electronically and written according to the following <br />format (will b e considered disqualified otherwise): <br /> <br />Font size: minimum 11 pt <br />M argins : 1 inch <br />M aximum number of pages: 5 (excluding maps and attachments) <br /> 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.