My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
14d
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
14d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:35:29 PM
Creation date
10/2/2008 12:14:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/17/2008
Description
Director's Report - CWCB Director
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- The Applicant is granted a conditional appropriative right of substitution and exchange <br />for the RIC Exchange in the amount of 13.58 a.f. (excluding transit losses) at a rate of <br />1.33 c.f.s. The conditional right of substitution and exchange's appropriation date is <br />October 4, 2004. <br />- The Applicant shall install measuring devices, provide accounting, and supply <br />calculations regarding the timing of depletions as required by the Division Engineer. <br />(2) Case No. 5-05Cw190 Application of Roll International Corp., Inc. <br />The Board ratified this statement of opposition at its January 2006 meeting. The Board's main <br />objective in filing the statement of opposition in this case was to ensure that the Applicant's proposed <br />plan for augmentation does not injure the Board's instream flow water rights on the Roaring Fork <br />River. Staff, in cooperation with the Attorney General's Office, has negotiated a settlement to ensure <br />that the CWCB's instream flow water rights will not be injured. <br />The Board holds the following instream flow water rights that could have been injured by this <br />application: <br />CWCB <br />Case No. Stream/Lake Amount <br />cfs Approp. <br />Date watershed Coun <br />~ <br />5-76w2948 Roaring Fork River 32 1/14/76 Roaring Fork River Pitkin <br />5-85CW646 Roaring Fork River 55/30 11/08/85 Roaring Fork River Pitkin <br />5-85CW639 Roaring Fork River 145/75 11/08/85 Roaring Fork River Pitkin <br />The CWCB and the Applicant have agreed to the entry of a decree that will prevent injury to the <br />Board's ISF water rights on the Roaring Fork River. The Applicant has agreed to the following <br />terms and conditions: <br />The Applicant will only operate the RIC Exchange when it is in-priority. <br />- When a call originating from a water right at or above the confluence of the Roaring Fork <br />River and Frying Pan Rivers would otherwise prevent Applicant from diverting water for <br />irrigation, the Applicant will curtail river diversions. The Applicant may continue to <br />withdraw ground water from Pine Lake only and will release water from the RIC Pond <br />directly into Pine Lake to augment irrigation depletions from Pine Lake. A115.7 acre-feet <br />of active storage decreed to the RIC Pond in Case No. OSCwl89 will be available to <br />replace the irrigation depletions from Pine Lake. If the Applicant uses the entire <br />augmentation volume stored in RIC Pond and a call on this reach of the Roaring Fork <br />River remains in effect, then the Applicant will curtail water use for irrigation purposes <br />pursuant to this plan for augmentation. <br />- The Applicant expects to operate its irrigation pump station at Pine Lake at flow rates <br />greater than the Division Engineer's estimate of the duty of water for the irrigated <br />acreage, i.e., 1 c.f.s. per 40 acres. This is because the Applicant's expected irrigation <br />schedule diverts from Pine Lake (either directly from Pine Lake well or rediversion of <br />water pumped to Pine Lake from the RIC Pump and Pipeline and the RIC Pump and <br />Pipeline No. 2) at higher rates for between 10 minutes and 8 hours a day rather than at <br />lower rates for extended periods. The cumulative effects of numerous water users <br />implementing similar irrigation practices may result in short-term swings in streamflow <br />rates to its out-of priority stream depletions. If the Division Engineer determines that the <br />irrigation schedule results in fluctuations in out-of priority stream depletions not fully <br />Page 2 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.