My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
14d
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
14d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:35:29 PM
Creation date
10/2/2008 12:14:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/17/2008
Description
Director's Report - CWCB Director
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Xcel submits comments on Final EA <br />• FERC issues license order <br />October 2009 <br />No later than <br />June 2010 <br />The stakeholder group met in Durango on September 3, 2008. This was the group's sixth meeting to <br />develop a mutually acceptable alternative to a bypass flow in connection with the issuance of the license. <br />Xcel representatives walked the group through the revised timeline and informed them that, in addition to <br />the steps outlined above, Xcel or any stakeholder can request a section 241 "trial-type hearing" on the <br />license application, with such request due on or before December 4, 2008. <br />According to Xcel representatives, preparation for and participation in such hearings is very expensive <br />and time-consuming for all parties. Xcel stated that if the group cannot agree upon an alternative by <br />October 10, 2008, Xcel may request a section 241 hearing. Representatives of the USFSIBLM and the <br />CDOW presented a counterproposal to the group comprised of two separate alternatives, both of which <br />would be implemented, in part, through the Instream Flow Program. <br />After a thorough discussion of the alternatives, Xcel expressed its intent to more fully evaluate the <br />alternatives internally, and the group scheduled a phone conference for September 1 1, 2008. Because the <br />alternatives are in draft form and have not been agreed upon by the group, staff has not included a <br />description of the alternatives in this report. Staff will continue to participate in the discussions and keep <br />the Board informed of the status of these negotiations. (Linda Bassi) <br />CLOUD SEEDING WORKSHOP IN DURANGO: Bruce Whitehead, CWCB Board Member, <br />hosted an August workshop for about twenty individuals that represent agencies invested in cloud seeding <br />through the three permitted programs in southwestern Colorado known as the Telluride, Western, and <br />Eastern San Juan Mountains programs. <br />ContractorlPermit Holder Larry Hjermstad of Western Weather Consultants, staff members Joe Busto & <br />Randy Seaholm, Arlen Huggins of the Desert Research Institute of Nevada, and Tom Ryan of the <br />Metropolitan District of Southern California were the main presenters. The topics included: the CWCB <br />strategic plan, Colorado River Seven Basin States water augmentation initiative, Nevada's cloud seeding <br />program and evaluation techniques, the new Grand Mesa program seeding equipment, and a recap of last <br />winter program and request for funding by Western Weather Consultants. <br />A key statement made by Huggins, a noted expert in the field, was that the links in the chain of events for <br />cloud seeding have been well documented and one of the remaining questions would be whether or not <br />Colorado's programs are "reliably releasing seeding material into clouds" to achieve the desired increase <br />in snowpack. <br />Further investigation may result in recommendations that some generators are suitable and some need to <br />be moved higher in elevation. Higher elevation generators may require an investment in remote operated <br />technology that involves cell, radio, or satellite communications. This type of remote operated cloud <br />seeding ice nuclei generator has been deployed in Nevada since 1975. Also discussed was the San Juan <br />Resource Conservation & Development Council contracting and administrating on behalf of all the <br />regional, state, and project sponsors. <br />~~~~ 23 ,w <br />~, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.