Laserfiche WebLink
USFWS therefore has requested a "Selenium Reduction Program" (SRP) be included as part of any PBO. <br />The cost of a SRP will be extremely expensive, particularly if has to meet the existing standard of 4.6 <br />microgramslliter. <br />The USFWS maintains that an SRP is needed in order to achieve recovery of the fish and that failure to <br />reduce selenium levels to the standard will result in a "take" of endangered fish under Section 9 of the <br />ESA. The USFWS maintains that elevated selenium levels prevent survival of larval fish, however, there <br />does not appear to any conclusive evidence to that affect. Selenium concentrations in the Gunnison River <br />have been above the standard for many years and there have been no claims of adverse impacts to <br />endangered fish prior to this. <br />Furthermore, there is already a SRP of sorts being implemented in the Uncompahgre Basin and while <br />under funded it is having positive results. Staff is working with water users on a proposal to present to <br />Reclamation in hopes that Reclamation and the USFWS will find it acceptable for inclusion in the PBO. <br />(Randy Seaholm) <br />RECOVERY GOALS FOR ENDANGERED COLORADO RIVER FISH: The USFWS is <br />updating the 2002 recovery goals for the four endangered fishes of the Colorado River Basin. The 2008 <br />updates to the recovery goals were developed as an amendment and supplement to the recovery plan for <br />each species and focus on the requirements of Section 4(~(1)(B) of the ESA. This Section requires the <br />Secretary of Interior incorporate into each plan site-specific management actions; objective, measurable <br />criteria; and estimates of the time and costs to carry out the measures needed to achieve the plan's goals <br />and to take immediate steps toward that goal. The recovery goals have been updated to include <br />significant new information in four maj or areas: <br />• Inclusion of language that discusses "significant portion of range" as opined by the Department of <br />Interior solicitor (Section 2.1) <br />• Inclusion of a brief discussion on "effects of climate change" (Section4.5.2) <br />• Inclusion of estimates of time and costs to achieve recovery (Section 5.4) <br />• Based on new information, the minimum viable population (MVP) for Colorado Pikeminnow was <br />changed from 2,600 to 2,800 (Section3.3.2) <br />These updates are only being reviewed by the seven states and key stakeholders by way of existing <br />conservation programs at this time. After comments from the seven states and key stakeholders are <br />addressed, the draft recovery goals will be released for public comment through the Federal Resister. <br />(Randy Seaholm) <br />UPPER COLORADO RIVER RECOVERY PROGRAM -15-MILE REACH <br />ACCOUNTING: Pursuant to the Programmatic Biological Opinion (PBO) for the 15-Mile Reach of <br />the Colorado River above the Gunnison River confluence an accounting of depletions above the reach is <br />required every 5 years. The first PBO depletion accounting report is now in final draft. The report shows <br />that there was no increase in consumptive uses above the 15-Mile Reach during the period 2001-2005. <br />The 2001-2005 average total consumptive use was calculated to be 987,200 AF per year, while the <br />average from 1971-2005 was 1.029 MAF, and the average for 1971-2000 was 1.03 59 MAF per year. The <br />small decline can be attributed in part to the recent drought and water conservation efforts. Please note <br />that only actual uses, not conditional uses or consultations, are reflected in these computations. Since the <br />implementation of the Recovery Program, there have been consultations on more than 350 actual projects <br />~~~~ 15 ~N <br />~e <br />~~ <br />