My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08 (4)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
08 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:33:43 PM
Creation date
10/2/2008 11:54:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/16/2008
Description
CF Section - Amendment 52 - Use of Severance Tax Revenue for Highways
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3ra Draft <br />1 How does Amendment 52 change current law? Of the 50 percent of severance <br />2 taxes spent on state programs, Amendment 52 constitutionally limits the amount that the <br />3 state legislature can spend to the prior year's amount plus inflation (with an adjustment if <br />4 severance tax collections decrease). The remaining amount of the state portion must <br />5 be used to construct and maintain highways, with priority given to relieving congestion <br />6 on Interstate-70 (I-70). The state legislature is responsible for budgeting the highway <br />7 money. The state legislature maintains the ability to distribute both the money that is <br />8 currently returned to local governments and the money spent on state programs, in any <br />9 way it chooses, just as it does now. <br />10 Whaf is the projected change in spending under Amendment 52. Table 1 <br />11 shows the projected shift in spending from state programs to highway projects under <br />12 Amendment 52. For example, in 2009, state programs receive $181 million under <br />13 current law. Under Amendment 52, these programs receive $92 million, and $89 million <br />14 is shifted to highway projects aimed at relieving congestion on I-70. <br />15 Table 1. Projected Change in State Portion of <br />16 Severance Tax Spending in Millions of Dollars <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br /> <br /> 2009 2010 2011 2012 Four-Year Total <br />Projected Total Severance Tax <br />Revenue $347 $246 $278 $290 $1,160 <br /> <br />State Program Money <br />under Current Law $181 $131 $147 $154 $613 <br />Amount for State Programs <br />under Amendment 52* $92 $95 $98 $101 $387 <br />Shift from State Programs to <br />Highway Projects $89 $36 $49 $53 $226 <br />under Amendment 52 <br />- T - - I - <br />27 * Based on a projected annual inflation rate that varies between 2.2 and 3.5 percent. <br />28 How are transportation projects currently funded? Fuel taxes, vehicle registration <br />29 fees, a portion of income and sales taxes, and federal highway money finance <br />30 transportation projects in Colorado. The state received about $1.2 billion for transportation <br />31 projects in budget year 2008, with fuel taxes and vehicle registration fees at $415 million, <br />32 federal funds at $408 million, and income and sales taxes at $426 million. <br />33 How do Amendment 52 and Amendment (#113) interact? Both Amendment <br />34 52 and Amendment (#113) change how the state spends severance tax revenue, but <br />35 the two measures propose different uses for the money. Thus, some of the provisions of <br />36 these measures appear to conflict with one another. This measure proposes a change <br />37 to the state constitution, and Amendment (#113) proposes a change to state statute. <br />38 When conflicts arise between the constitution and statutes, the constitution prevails. <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.