My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06 (3)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
06 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:33:20 PM
Creation date
10/2/2008 11:48:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/16/2008
Description
IWMD Section - Presentation on Northern Integrated Supply Project (NISP)
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- NISP has considerable public awareness ("great deal"/"some information") and support <br />among residents ("strongly" and "somewhat" favor). <br />• 52% awareness - Larimer; 63% favor the project; 24% oppose <br />• 28% awareness -Weld; 81% favor the project; 8% oppose <br />- Need for water and storage are top reasons for support of NISP, with growth a factor. ; <br />Opposition concerned about impact on Poudre River, the environment, the necessity a>~ the <br />plan. .~ <br />- Residents use Poudre River for recreation and relaxation. About two-fifths will use Glade <br />Reservoir. <br />• 73% picnic Poudre River - Larimer; 53% Weld <br />• 33% raft Poudre River Canyon - Larimer <br />• 39% will use Glade Reservoir - Larimer; 41 % Weld <br />- NISP major policy themes highlighted. Significant agreement with: <br />• Protecting agriculture, farm economy and open space <br />• Cooperation on water issues among communities <br />• Protecting northern Colorado water for local purposes <br />• Water management aspects of Poudre River and Big Thompson <br />• Water management, drought protection and recreation aspects of Glade Reservoir <br />• Less agreement and less firm opinion about Poudre River flows <br />- When offered choice, public prefer: i <br />• Sustain agriculture and keep water: 84% Larimer; 89% Weld <br />• Conservation not enough; need storage: 73% Larimer; 87% Weld <br />• NISP will not dry up Poudre: 49% Larimer; 50% Weld <br />- Water supply policy main themes cited. Significant support for development of: <br />• Conservation/reuse programs: 93% Larimer; 94% Weld <br />• Storage for agriculture: 87% Larimer; 94% Weld <br />• Storage to keep water in area and for shortage and drought: 87% Larimer; 95% Weld <br />• Supply for residential growth: 77% Larimer; 86% Weld <br />- Public has formed opinions on water policy, but: <br />• One-third not aware of Colorado-Big Thompson water contribution to Poudre River <br />flows: 35% Larimer; 40% Weld <br />• There is confusion on location of wild and scenic designation among Larimer residents <br />- About one-fifth of residents are active in environmental movement, and about one-half are <br />sympathetic. <br />~J <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.