My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150122 Approval Letter 2
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
C150122 Approval Letter 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2011 9:17:12 AM
Creation date
9/22/2008 11:34:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150122
Contractor Name
Central Weld County Water District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
4
County
Larimer
Bill Number
SB 03-110
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Approval Letter
Supplemental fields
Water Division
1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Central Weld County Water District - Proposed Dry Creek Reservoir <br />November 25-26, 2002 . <br /> <br />Agenda Item 20g <br /> <br />Permitting - Preliminary environmental assessments have been completed. There are several <br />wildlife and plant issues to be addressed, but none that will prevent construction permitting. Initial <br />archaeological assessment has been conducted and has identified several sites of significance <br />within one mile of the site. Additional on-site assessment will be required before construction to <br />determine appropriate mitigation. The reservoir development will require a Corps of Engineers 404 <br />Permit. In order to comply with Department of Wildlife requirements covered by the 404 permit, a <br />depletion analysis will qe necessary to determine effects of the reservoir on the South Platte River. <br />No significant depletion is expected. The project will be subject to review for special use by Larimer <br />County. Based on conversations between L TWD and Larimer County, no issues have been <br />identified that would prevent development of the reservoir. Property issues are currently being <br />addressed. A total of 23 properties are expected to be affected, only four of which are expected to <br />have to be purchased in their entirety. <br /> <br />Financial Analvsis <br /> <br />The total estimated cost of the project is $10,500,000 in a 50/50 partnership with the L TWD, with <br />each entity borrowing $3,937,500 from the CWCS. The total loan will be for 75% of the estimated <br />project cost. The District qualifies for a blended Municipal Middle/High Income Interest Rate. Staff <br />is recommending a 20-year maximum amount of $3,937,500 at an interest rate of 4.15% per year. <br />The District has budgeted the $1,312,500,25 percent local match, needed for their portion of the <br />project, and the money is in place in reserves for that purpose. The current water rates are <br />sufficient to support the loan payment, and no rate increases are necessary to complete this <br />project. <br /> <br />Alternative financing sources: The District did consider bonding for this project but opted to <br />pursue funding through CWCS because of more favorable lending rates. <br /> <br />Table 1 is a summary of the financial aspects of the project. A CWCS Construction Loan of <br />$3,937,500 would have an annual payment of $322,948 (including the 10% reserve requirement) at <br />the loan terms of 4.15% per year for 20 years. <br /> <br />Table 1. Financial Summary <br /> <br /> <br />$5,250,000 <br />40,000 <br />9500 <br />$3,937,500 <br />$322,948 <br />$21.50 <br />$2.83 <br />e) $124.21 <br /> <br />Creditworthiness: The District currently has two revenue bonds, one with US SanCorp Piper <br />Jaffray, with a remaining amount of $2,455,000 maturing in 2007, and one with the Colorado Water <br />Resources and Power Development Authority, with a remaining amount of $1,098,410 maturing in <br />2012. Annual payments on both bonds total $625,570. The District is in compliance with the <br />covenants of the bond resolutions pertaining to revenues and expenses. CWCS would require <br />parity of pledged water'revenues with these bonds. <br /> <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.