My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Front Range Water Council Response
CWCB
>
Interbasin Compact Committee
>
DayForward
>
Front Range Water Council Response
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 11:53:54 AM
Creation date
9/17/2008 12:44:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Interbasin Compact Committee
Title
Front Range Water Council Response to Visioning
Date
2/26/2008
Interbasin CC - Doc Type
Correspondence/Memos
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Implementation of the above "fixes" can be largely done within the framework of the existing <br />water rights, water allocation and environmental/permitting system, though some <br />legislative/regulatory changes would be required. However, what is most important is to have the <br />necessary will and financial commitment. The former could be manifest in the HB 1177 process, <br />though the Roundtable and, to some extent the IBCC members have evidently chosen, to date, a <br />more parochial approach to their mission. This then turns, in part, on the make up of the <br />Roundtable and IBCC. Are the representatives looking, on an individual basis, at what is in the <br />best interest of the state as a whole, with a genuine effort to understand and accommodate the <br />water demands of others? The latter will necessitate a significant monetary contribution from the <br />state taxpayers, be it through income taxes, sales taxes, severance taxes, etc., along with water <br />supplier investment. <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.