My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
IBCC Representative Comments
CWCB
>
Interbasin Compact Committee
>
DayForward
>
IBCC Representative Comments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 11:54:16 AM
Creation date
9/17/2008 12:15:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Interbasin Compact Committee
Title
IBCC Representative Comments on Visioning
Date
3/6/2008
Interbasin CC - Doc Type
Correspondence/Memos
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Statewide/ColoradoNampa Basin <br />Eric Kuhn, Dan Birch <br />Status Quo <br />• Look at how much technology has changed. From 1958 to present, how many <br />changes. This will happen again. Is the assumption that growth will continue with a <br />different energy economy safe. Movement of people may be different. Climate may <br />look different. Gasoline economy will change. <br />• Yampa - in 50 years in terms of water use not much different. People can live in <br />Yampa and work from home. <br />• Continued energy development, natural gas development will continue to move <br />northward. <br />• Uncertainty is in oil shale and secondary use of water for power. <br />• What do things look like with a Yampa Pumpback? <br />• Basic assumption that the next 50 years will look like the past 50 years. <br />• Much more competition on Colorado River in 50 years. <br />• Transfer of water from existing uses. <br />• The most the West Slope can hope for is to keep energy production down. <br />• Regions may not be able to have influence over what is a worldwide economic <br />force with respect to energy. <br />Alternative <br />• In 50 years the Colorado Basin will look like the Arkansas today, where any new <br />use is a change in use. <br />• Only so much we can talk about on supply side, we need to talk about it on the <br />demand side. <br />• We need to recognize we are in an era of change of uses not new development. <br />We need to prepare for this and talk about tradeoffs. <br />• Need to talk about land use planning - land use controls to promote high density <br />development (economy will also drive it). <br />• Do you want a pure market-driven approach; it will remove the resource from a <br />lower economic use to a higher economic use. <br />• What is the role of government in addressing the market? <br />• Let's not make the same mistake in Colorado that we made in the Arkansas, <br />Republican, and South Platte. Let's not allow overdevelopment. <br />• Overdevelopment - cannot meet obligations to downstream states. How much risk <br />are we willing to take? <br />4 <br />I:\INTERBASIN COMPACT COMMITTEEWISIONS FOR COLORADO WATER SUPPLY FUTURE\RESPONSES TO VISIONING AND MARCH MEETING\IBCC REPRESENTATIVE COMMENTS.DOC
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.