My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
IBCC Representative Comments
CWCB
>
Interbasin Compact Committee
>
DayForward
>
IBCC Representative Comments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 11:54:16 AM
Creation date
9/17/2008 12:15:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Interbasin Compact Committee
Title
IBCC Representative Comments on Visioning
Date
3/6/2008
Interbasin CC - Doc Type
Correspondence/Memos
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Rio Grande Basin <br />Steve Vandiver <br />Status Quo <br />• If we are going to have this discussion, we need to realize that the <br />developers/lobbyists are the most powerful people in the legislature, so we need to <br />be realistic in our discussion. <br />• As long as growth is allowed to continue, we have not learned any lessons from S. <br />California or the East Coast. <br />• Unlimited growth is unsustainable. To continue to allow unlimited growth is short- <br />sighted and foolish. <br />• Need to discuss land use planning and regional planning. Do we want to look like <br />Southern California? Want discussion to look at hard questions. <br />• All pipelines lead to the Front Range. <br />• Why not incentivize people to move all over the state, create opportunities on the <br />Western Slope, eastern and southern Colorado. <br />• Sprawl from Front Range to Pueblo miserable place to live, gridlock and place <br />enormous burden on the people of the state to support. <br />Alternative <br />• If water is transferred from a rural area we need to replace it with economic vitality <br />and something besides a prison. <br />• Site-specific additional storage for drought protection, and new growth, if <br />necessary. <br />• Why are we developing houses on the best farm land in the state? Need to be <br />thoughtful about developing houses on irreplaceable agricultural ground. <br />• Do need to be able to feed ourselves. Preserve as much agricultural ground as <br />possible. <br />• Treatment and reuse of effluent needs to be a requirement. <br />• Consider minimalization of new high altitude diversions to maintain ecosystems. <br />• Utilization of compact obligations to meet instream flows. This may require new <br />storage to handle that. <br />• The effect of conservation efforts are exaggerated, to rely heavily on conservation <br />is short-sighted. Historically people's water supply has come from return flows. <br />100% consumptive use would not be good. A lot of wetlands and riparian areas are <br />a direct result of tailwater and return flows. Conservation will impact this first and <br />foremost. <br />• Stop using new home starts as the basis for economic health. <br />18 <br />I:\INTERBASIN COMPACT COMMITTEEWISIONS FOR COLORADO WATER SUPPLY FUTURE\RESPONSES TO VISIONING AND MARCH MEETING\IBCC REPRESENTATIVE COMMENTS.DOC
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.