My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
30 (3)
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
30 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:38:17 PM
Creation date
8/22/2008 8:31:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/21/2008
Description
IWMD Section - Presentation of Agricultural Water Conservation Paper
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 7 <br />Future Considerations <br />The f ollowing points are considerations related to the implementation of agricultural <br />water conservation and of ficiency measures. These are presented by the Colorado Ag <br />Water Alliance as a starting point f or f urther dialog. It is important to note that any <br />successful implementation of these measures is only one component in meeting <br />Colorado's f uture water needs. The better use of existing surf ace and groundwater <br />storage resources and the development of new storage to meet future demands and <br />for drought years will also be required to meet both existing agricultural shortages <br />and future M&I demands. <br />1. Each agricultural operation and basin is unique and has unique water <br />management considerations. As such, thoughtful consideration should be made of <br />the effects of implementing agricultural water conservation measures, either at the <br />farm scale or basin-wide scale. <br />2. Incentives f or on-farm implementation of conservation measures should be <br />considered and evaluated in the context of compacts and basin hydrology. <br />3. Incentives for landowner control of phreatophytes, given salvaged water <br />limitations, should be developed. <br />4. To help create incentives for implementing water conservation measures, the cost <br />of water conservation measures should be borne by the beneficiaries of the <br />conserved water. The agricultural user is unlikely and/ or unable to bear the costs <br />if the benef its only accrue to improved stream f low, water quality, or the basin as <br />a whole. <br />5. It must be recognized that if irrigation water conservation measures are <br />implemented, in some areas there will be a periodic need for salinity leaching to <br />maintain productivity. <br />6. There is a need f or clearer statutory definitions of saved, salvaged, and conserved <br />water. <br />7. There is an opportunity f or statutory clarification of the legality to transfer <br />conserved CU water. <br />8. If legislation is enacted, the state will need to develop administrative means to <br />track and allocate conserved water and ensure compliance. <br />9. There is a need for irrigation water conservation demonstration and pilot projects <br />in each basin. <br />10. There is a need f or a more thorough analysis of the impact of widespread <br />adoption of sprinkler and drip irrigation systems in Colorado. <br />DRAFT 7-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.