My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
30 (3)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
30 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:38:17 PM
Creation date
8/22/2008 8:31:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/21/2008
Description
IWMD Section - Presentation of Agricultural Water Conservation Paper
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 2 <br />Introduction <br />or appropriation by others. In these instances, should incentives for landowners <br />and/ or irrigators be created or should government step in to pay for some of these <br />initiatives? Additional potential benefits and limitations are discussed in more detail <br />below. <br />Potential Benefits of Agricultural Water Conservation <br />The Colorado Statewide Water Supply Initiative (SWSI) report noted that the benefits <br />of agricultural water conservation measures may include: <br />1. Increased ability to deliver water to crops can stretch existing supplies. This <br />benefit would apply to irrigators unable to meet full crop needs that would benefit <br />if additional water could be more effectively and efficiently delivered to their <br />crops. <br />2. Reduced non-crop consumptive use and <br />evaporative losses. Some of the consumptive <br />use and losses maybe due to tailwater f rom <br />irrigation ponding at the end of fields and <br />evaporating, rather than returning as surf ace or <br />groundwater return flows. <br />3. Increased instream and return flows. <br />Historical agricultural return flows are a vital <br />part of the flows in all basins and downstream <br />surface water diverters and downstream states <br />have relied on these return f lows. These return <br />~~ `~ ~'~ y~Y_ ~~~ flows, in addition to satisfying downstream <br />water rights, also create delayed flows that can have instream and riparian <br />environmental benef its and maintain aquif ers f or domestic and irrigation wells. <br />4. Improved water quality that results from diminished leaching and runoff. As less <br />water moves across the landscape, there is less opportunity to move nutrients, <br />pesticides, sediments and other contaminants. Additionally, reducing the amount <br />of water applied to the land will also reduce the amount of soluble salts applied <br />via irrigation water and may prolong f field productivity. <br />Limitations of Uses of Agricultural Water Conservation <br />The SWSI and other reports also highlight factors that limit the extent to which <br />agricultural water conservation can be used to deliver additional water to meet other <br />needs: <br />1. Typically, any water that is generated by water conservation measures such as <br />canal lining or the conversion to more efficient irrigation practices can only be <br />used on lands for which the appropriation was originally made. Selling or <br />delivering conserved water to other users or new lands could constitute an <br />improper expansion of use under current laws. <br />DRAFT 2-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.