My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
22 (6)
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
22 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:37:23 PM
Creation date
8/21/2008 2:49:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/21/2008
Description
WSP Section - Lake Powell Pipeline (FERC 12966 UT & AZ - EIS Scoping)
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
agencies reviewing the Project. Because the Hydro System is only one component of the <br />proposed 180-mile-long water supply pipeline project, construction of substantial parts of the <br />overall Project will require permits from other federal agencies (USBR, BLM, NPS, USFWS and <br />EPA). Utah intends its PAD (and subsequent studies) to be used by all the agencies that would <br />need to issue permits for the Project, developing a record that can be used to prepare a single <br />environmental analysis document covering the entire water supply pipeline. <br />Staff has asked to be identified as an "interested party" in the EIS process and anticipates <br />providing comments during "Scoping." we have attached hereto Scoping Document 1(SD 1), <br />which more fully explains the Lake Powell Pipeline Project and EIS schedule for your <br />information. The Commission's regulations for the ILP require that parties wishing to submit <br />comments on the PAD or SDI, or wishing to request studies, do so within 60 days of the <br />issuance date (May 5, 2008) of SD 1. Public Scoping meetings will be held at the Dixie Center, <br />1835 Convention Center Drive, St. George, Utah; Cedar City Festival Hall Conference Center, <br />105 North 100 East, Cedar City, Utah; and Kanab Middle School, 690 Cowboy ~Uay, Kanab, <br />Utah on June 10,11 and 12 respectively. A tour of the proposed Project, which is open to the <br />public, will be held on June 9 and 10. <br />Discussion <br />The Lake Powell Pipeline Project involves the movement of water allocated to the State <br />of Utah under the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact to potions of the Lower Colorado River <br />basin within the State of Utah. The State of Utah is using between 70% and 75% of its Upper <br />Colorado River Basin Compact apportionment and therefore has room within its apportionment <br />to develop the Project. It is incumbent on the States of the Upper Division to assure that the <br />Project water is diverted under Utah's Upper Basin allocation and is done so in accord with the <br />terms of the Colorado River Compact and the Upper Colorado River Compact. The Upper <br />Colorado River Commission has also passed a resolution in support of the Project under certain <br />conditions. <br />Staff is concerned that the Project does not cause any diminution in the capacity of Lake <br />Powell, to 602(a) storage, and to the ability of Lake Powell to protect against the curtailment of <br />uses in the Upper Basin. Staff needs to understand how the Project impacts, if at all, the recently <br />adopted Guidelines concerning the coordinated operations of Lake Powell and Lake Mead. We <br />need to fully understand the terms and conditions that maybe included in any agreements or <br />required contracts and permits. Finally, staff feels the need to participate to object, if necessary, <br />to any agreements that the State of Utah may consider entering into with any of the Lower <br />Division States, particularly given Arizona's positions on the New Mexico's proposed Navajo- <br />Gallup project. <br />Recommendation <br />Staff requests that the Board affirm its participation in the Lake Powell Pipeline Project <br />EIS for the reasons outlined above and to notify the Utah Division of Natural Resources of our <br />concerns. Staff is also requesting input from the Board on any additional issues it believes <br />should be addressed in the process. <br />Attachment <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.