Laserfiche WebLink
• San Juan Water Commission (NM) - 20,800 AF of water and 10,400 AF of annual <br />depletion; and the <br />• La Plata WCD (NM) -1,560 AF of water with 780 AF of annual depletion. <br />Discussion <br />The State has four major issues to address with respect to the ALP: <br />• Administration of the proj ect water rights; <br />• Whether or not to purchase all or a portion of its allocation of proj ect water and if it elects <br />to purchase the water how to finance the purchase; <br />• Participation in the proj ect operating entity if it purchases all or a portion of its allocation <br />of proj ect water; and <br />• Development of recreational facilities around the reservoir. <br />This agenda item will focus on whether or not the state should purchase its allocation of proj ect <br />water and if it does, the terms of participation in the ALP operations Association. <br />Potential State Purchase <br />The State has the option of entering into a repayment contract with the U.S. Bureau of <br />Reclamation to purchase all or a portion of its project water allocation. If the State elects not to <br />purchase any of its water, that water will be reallocated equally to the two Ute Tribes. To date, <br />the State has elected not to enter into a repayment contract because there is not an immediately <br />identifiable market for the water. However, the Southwestern Water Conservation District has <br />been urging the State to purchase its allocation (letter attached). <br />The Ute Tribes' allocated water supply is sufficient to meet their present and anticipated <br />future M&I needs, leaving a significant portion that they would be willing to lease to others on a <br />long-term or permanent basis. The Tribes are willing to discuss leases and various terms and <br />conditions to help assure non-tribal interests access at a fair cost to any of the State water that <br />reverts, but to date they have not shown any interest in selling. The State, if it elected to buy its <br />allocation or any portion thereof, would likely prefer to sell its allocation and assign a <br />proportionate share of the O,M&R costs. <br />The total cost of the ALP is currently estimated to be $571 Million (indexed through <br />October 2008), the cost of water to non-tribal water users was capped at $43,000,000 plus <br />inflation in P.L 108-447 (the 2005 Consolidated Appropriations Act (section 207)) in addition to <br />already sunk costs. If the State elects to buy all the water allocated to them the capital cost is <br />currently about $27,600,000 in 2008 dollars (10,420 AF of supply for $26491AF or 5,230 AF of <br />depletion for $52771AF). The cost, while high for M&I water in southwest Colorado, isn't <br />unreasonable for M&I water else ware. <br />In addition to the capital costs, there will be annual O,M&R costs and pumping costs <br />associated with the replenishment of any water used from storage in Ridges Basin Reservoir. <br />Depending on how the State would use its storage, pumping costs at build out could be as high as <br />$260,000 annually, maybe more if the fuel costs continue to rise. Annual 0&M Costs are <br />estimated to be around $1,600,000, of which Colorado would pay $176,000 if it buys its full <br />allocation. In addition, there would be a reserve account for facility replacement. Therefore, in <br />addition to $27,600,000 capital cost, Colorado may need to come up with about $500,000 <br />annually for O,M&R and pumping, assuming it buys the full allocation available to it. If the <br />proposed Operating Agreement attached hereto is approved, it is anticipated that the "Variable <br />Cost Fund" would offset all pumping costs for the foreseeable future. <br />Operating Entity <br />The US Bureau of Reclamation would like anon-federal operating entity in place by <br />completion of the project in 2012. It is recognized that the sooner such an entity can be <br />2 <br />