My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06d
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
06d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 2:33:35 PM
Creation date
8/21/2008 8:15:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/20/2008
Description
CWCB Director's Report
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
In a letter to Gary Buffington, director of Larimer County Natural Resources, R.P. Van Gytenbeek, FFF <br />chief executive officer, wrote, "The Federation of Fly Fishers is appalled that your department would seek <br />to sell off public access in the Big Thompson Canyon without full public disclosure and consultation with <br />user groups." <br />Van Gytenbeek proposed formation of a user group that might include representatives of the Division of <br />Wildlife, FFF, Trout Unlimited and local fly shops. He said adverse Larimer County action won't <br />influence the impending move, but that FFF felt it had to do the right thing by the river. <br />At issue are some 150 plots purchased by the federal government and earmarked for public access in the <br />wake of the catastrophic 1976 flood and accrued to Larimer Parks and Open Lands. Most have languished <br />in obscurity, but the list includes numerous unmarked areas accessed for years by anglers at pullouts from <br />U.S. 36. <br />Other parcels have little or no public value or access. (Source: Denver Post) <br />HIGH LINE AURORA DEAL WON'T BLOCK OTHER LEASES -Shareholders on the High <br />Line Canal would not be restricted from leasing to water users other than Aurora under an agreement <br />signed in January, the canal's superintendent said. <br />The agreement gives Aurora the opportunity to find water from willing shareholders in three out of ten <br />years, but does not obligate shareholders to lease to Aurora or prevent them from leasing to anyone else. <br />No water was leased or prices set in the agreement. <br />The agreement would also not preclude any shareholder from leasing water through another plan, such as <br />the Super Ditch being promoted by the Lower Arkansas Valley Water Conservancy District. <br />The agreement protects Aurora's ability to exchange up to 500 acre-feet through a 2005 water court <br />filing, but does not limit other shareholders from exchanging above that amount, if there is opportunity. <br />An exchange allows upstream diversion for downstream releases and certain river conditions have to be <br />met to avoid injuring intervening water rights. Aurora most likely would use the exchanges to move water <br />to Twin Lakes, where it pumps it into the South Platte Basin, during drought recovery years. <br />Any lease to Aurora would be a one-time sale of water that does not change water rights. <br />Under a 2003 agreement with the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District, Aurora is limited to <br />leasing water three years out of 10. <br />Under the 2003 bylaw change, the board does have final say in all water movement, which would be <br />necessary for any lease. The shareholders on the ditch who do not lease water are also provided protection <br />under the High Line's rules. <br />Aurora also provides reciprocal services to the High Line under the agreement, continuing a relationship <br />with the board that benefits shareholders. <br />~ 21 ~~~ <br />~l <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.