Laserfiche WebLink
within the reach. The sul~t of this report is a 2.5 mile segment hider Creek beginning at its <br />headwaters and extending to Highway 145. (see Figure 1). This segment is located northwest of <br />the Town of Telluride. To date, the staff has received only one recommendation for this reach. <br />• This recommendation is discussed below. <br />Instream Flow Recommendation(s) <br />The CDOW has recommended a 5.25 cfs summer flow and a 1.0 cfs winter flow. <br />Land Status Review <br /> Total Length Land Ownershi <br />Upper Terminus Lower Terminus (miles) % Private % Public <br />Headwaters San Miguel River 2.8 15% 85% <br />This segment is approximately 15% public land and °~o private land. 100% of the public land is <br />managed by the USFS (See attached Figure 1). <br />Biological Data <br />The CDOW has conducted field surveys of the fishery resources on this stream and have found a <br />natural environment that can be preserved. As reported for this reach of stream in CDOW'S <br />recommendation letter to the CWCB, Eider Creek was sampled using standard electrofishing <br />equipment approximately 1 mile above the confluence with the San Miguel River. The aquatic <br />sampling summary (See CDOW Fish Survey in Appendix B - on the field data sheet) shows that <br />a self sustaining brook trout fishery exists in Eider Creek. Eider Creek also has a healthy aquatic <br />macroinvertebrate population indicative of high quality water. Eider Creek also supports a <br />• healthy riparian community. Instream flows are needed to preserve and protect these biological <br />communities in addition to the existing brook trout fishery. Eider Creek also produces high <br />quality water that serves to provide assurance that mine clean-up activities in the upper San <br />Miguel basin (above the Town of Telluride) will continue to show improvements to the river's <br />water quality and the river's fish population. <br />Field Survey Data <br />CDOW and CWCB staff used the R2Cross methodology to quantify the amount of water <br />required to preserve the natural environment to a reasonable degree. The R2Cross method <br />requires that stream dischazge and channel profile data be collected in a riffle stream habitat type. <br />Riffles are most easily visualized as the stream habitat types that would dry up first should <br />streamflow cease. This type of hydraulic data collection consists of setting up a transect, <br />surveying the stream channel geometry, and measuring the stream discharge. Appendix B <br />contains copies of field data collected for this proposed segment. <br />Biological Flow Recommendations <br />The CWCB staff relied upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to interpret <br />output from the R2Cross .data collected to develop the initial, biologic. instream flow <br />recommendation. This initial recommendation is designed to address the unique biologic <br />requirements of each stream without regazd to water availability. Three instream flow hydraulic <br />parameters, average depth, percent wetted perimeter, and average velocity, are used to develop <br />• biologic instream flow recommendations. The CDOW has determined that maintaining these <br />three hydraulic parameters at adequate levels across riffle habitat types, aquatic habitat in pools <br />and runs will also be maintained for most life stages of fish and aquatic invertebrates (Nehring <br />1979; Espegren 1996). <br />-3- <br />