Laserfiche WebLink
RIO GRANDE BASIN <br />Basinwide Conditions Assessment <br />The SWSI value for the month was 1.6. Flow at the <br />gaging station Rio Grande near Del Norte averaged 3829 cfs <br />(125% of normal). The Conejos River near Mogote had a <br />mean flow of 1452 cfs (112% of normal). Streamflow in the <br />upper Rio Grande basin was erratic during early June as <br />temperatures fluctuated widely, but settled to the normal <br />slow decline as the winter snowpack melts out. The higher <br />elevations and the Valley floor received below average <br />precipitation during June, and for the fourth consecutive <br />month. Storage in Platoro, Rio Grande, and Santa Maria <br />reservoirs totaled 83% of normal as of the end of June. <br />Outlook <br />As the month of June came to a close, some <br />monsoonal-type activity began, replacing the dry, windy <br />conditions of April, May and early June. NWS 90-day <br />forecasts for July through September suggest higher than <br />normal temperatures and a chance for normal precipitation. <br />AdministrativelManagement Concerns <br />Some of the upper Rio Grande basin streamflows have <br />not been as prolific as forecasted. The result is the lessening of <br />water right curtailment on the Rio Grande and the Conejos to <br />meet the Rio Grande Compact delivery obligation. <br />The vast network of satellite-monitored gauging <br />stations in Division 3 is a great benefit to water administrators, <br />farmers, ranchers, and recreators. The Colorado Division of <br />Water Resources website at www.water.state.co.us provides <br />easy access to over 80 satellite-monitored gauges in Division 3 <br />alone. The gauges include 57 local creeks and rivers, 19 <br />ditches and canals, 7 reservoirs, and access to an additional 20 <br />stations monitored by the U.S. Geological Survey in Colorado <br />and New Mexico essential for administration of the Rio Grande <br />and Costilla Creek Compacts. <br />Current flows can be monitored against historic <br />average daily flows, with many stations having over 50 years of <br />data. Review of the recent streamflow data in the upper Rio <br />Grande basin reveals a hodge-podge of conditions. The <br />mainstem of the Rio Grande and the Conejos River and their <br />tributaries have experienced above-average flow during the <br />2008 runoff. The Alamosa and LaJara Creek drainages have <br />also been good producers. The Saguache, La Garita and <br />Carnero area has been disappointing, with below average <br />flows. On the east side, 2008 volumes have been very random, <br />with some streams such as Ute, Rito Alto, and Cottonwood <br />Creeks all above normal, yet Crestone and Sangre de Cristo <br />Creeks below average. In summary, what was shaping up to <br />be a very high runoff year for this portion of the state, has in <br />reality produced spotty results. <br />Public Use Impacts <br />Finally, some consistently sunny conditions favored the <br />farmers and ranchers aiding the growth of crops and grazing <br />land during the last three weeks of June. The first cutting of <br />hay and alfalfa yielded a bit below normal due to the cold <br />temperatures during May and early June. <br />J u I-08 <br />RIO GRANDE BASIN SV~61 HISTORY <br />4 <br /> <br />3 <br />2 <br /> <br />W <br />1 <br />W <br />J <br />Q <br />>o <br />X <br />W <br />0 <br />Z <br />-1 <br />} <br />0! <br />-2 <br />-3 <br />4 <br />- <br />Jan-99 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-O8 <br />MONTHIYEAR <br />RIO GRANDE NR DEL NORTE, FLOW BY WATER YEAR <br />1,200,000 <br />~,1000000 ~ <br />Q ~°,°°° <br />0 <br />~ ~~~ <br />W <br />~,~ <br />U ~~ <br />0 <br />Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mardi A~nl May June July A~ag Sept <br />~ U~Ef (198 ~ DRY (2002) ~ AVG ~ 2008 <br />