My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SPDSS_Task81-2_Consumptive Use and Water Budget Technical Peer Review Meeting Follow-Up
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
SPDSS_Task81-2_Consumptive Use and Water Budget Technical Peer Review Meeting Follow-Up
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2011 11:32:06 AM
Creation date
7/16/2008 9:31:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
SPDSS Task 81.2 - Consumptive Use and Water Budget Technical Peer Review Meeting Follow-Up
Description
The purpose of this memorandum is to document results from further investigations conducted in response to questions and suggestions provided during the reviews, and to keep others informed of subsequent findings.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
1/11/2008
DSS Category
Consumptive Use
Water Budget
DSS
South Platte
Basin
South Platte
Contract/PO #
C153953
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
SB01-157, HB02-1152, SB03-110, HB04-1221, SB05-084, HB06-1313, SB07-122
Prepared By
Leonard Rice Engineering
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PCU Difference (NOAH -NCWCD) <br />1 <br />50 <br />. <br />,.., 1.00 <br />w <br />v <br />c <br />w <br />v <br />c <br />w <br />`w <br />D <br />U <br />a 0 <br />50 <br />. <br /> <br />0 <br />00 <br />. <br />o`O o`O o~ o~ o0 00 00 00 00 0o p~ o~ p`ti p`ti o`~ o`~ off` off` o~' <br />~a~ ~o~ ~a~ ~~ ~a~ ~~ ~a~ ~~ ~a~ ~~ Sao ~~ Sao ~~ ~a~ ~~ ~a~ ~~ ~a~ <br />Figure 1. Differences in PCU at Sterling NOAA and NCWCD Climate Stations. <br />Further investigation of the locations of key NOAA climate stations used to estimate ET <br />in the highly irrigated areas of Water Districts 1, 2, and 64 showed that 60 percent of the <br />stations are urban and 40 percent of the stations are rural. However, 13 of the tota126 <br />key NOAA climate stations used for SPDSS are in an agricultural setting. SPDSS <br />consumptive use analyses are basin-wide, and a primary goal is to determine procedures <br />that can best be applied throughout the basin. Therefore, although the difference in <br />potential consumptive use reflecting the "urban heat island effect" shown in Figure 1 is <br />noted, we did not revise our original approach and calibration efforts used the same <br />climate data for daily and monthly calculations. <br />Revised ASCE Standardized Penman Monteith Coefficients -The SPDSS calibrated <br />coefficients were developed using the ASCE Standardized Penman Monteith method <br />with crop coefficients developed by Wright and provided in Table 6.9 of ASCE Manual <br />70. The Kimberly website (www.kimberly.uidaho.edu/water/asceewri/) has two papers <br />by Jim Wright and Rick Allen that provide new sets of slightly different coefficients to <br />use with ASCE Penman Monteith. These papers were not available during the calibrated <br />coefficient efforts. According to "The ASCE Standardized Reference Evapotranspiration <br />Equation" prepared by the Task Committee on Standardization of the Reference <br />Evapotranspiration of the Environmental and Water Resources Research Institute of the <br />American Society of Civil Engineers in 2005 (page 47), the mean crop coefficients <br />reported by ASCE Manua170 for use with alfalfa reference can be used directly with the <br />ASCE Standardized method "for most practical applications." In addition, we re-ran the <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.