Laserfiche WebLink
RGDSS Memorandum <br />Final <br />To: Ray Bennett, Ray Alvarado, Andy Moore <br />From: LRCWE, Greg Roush and Erin Wilson <br />Subject: RGDSS -Task 8.1 Review of Previous Water Budgets <br />Date: Apri124, 2001 <br />Introduction <br />This memorandum summarizes the results of Task 8.1 of the Consumptive Use and Water Budget portion of <br />the RGDSS. The initial purpose of Task 8.1 was to review five previous water budget investigations to help <br />guide development of the RGDSS surface water and ground water models. In addition, this memorandum <br />has been updated to include the results of the RGDSS Water Budget Analysis. The objective of this task is <br />as follows: <br />Several investigators have previously attempted to define parts of the water budget components for <br />the valley: <br />• Emery (1973), <br />• Huntley (1976), <br />• HRS Water Consultants (1987), and <br />• Hearne and Dewey (1988), <br />• State of Colorado DWR (Dewayne Schroeder, 1988). <br />These water budget investigations will be reviewed for data, approaches, analysis parameters, and <br />results. A memorandum will be prepared comparing values for the water budget components and <br />discussing differences in approaches. In addition, the memorandum will be updated to include a <br />comparison to a water budget prepared for the RGDSS. <br />The approach and results to the RGDSS Water Budget Analysis are presented in RGDSS-Consumptive Use <br />and Water Budget Component- Procedures Memorandum, April 2001, LRCWE. Results from the RGDSS <br />Ground Water Area water budget analysis will be compared to the findings from the review of the five <br />previous water budget investigations. <br />Approach <br />The five previous water budget investigations listed below were reviewed to determine the study area, data <br />used, approach taken and assumptions made, that support the water budget results presented. Results of the <br />five previous water budgets plus the RGDSS water budget are summarized in Tables 1 and 2 for review. <br />Table 1 includes the Emery, Huntley, HRS, and Hearne and Dewey studies, where the water budgets include <br />total surface water and ground water balances. Table 2 shows the results of the Schroeder study, where the <br />water budget was developed to represent inflows, outflows, and storage changes for the ground water aquifer <br />beneath the San Luis Valley. Note before comparing these results directly, the reviewer should be aware that <br />each investigation may have used a different study period, study area, and approach, as discussed under the <br />Results section of this memorandum. <br />• Emery, P. A., et al (1973), Water in the San Luis Valley, South-Central Colorado, Colorado Water <br />Resources Circular No. 18, 26 p <br />• Huntley, David, (1976), Ground Water Recharge to the Aquifers of Northern San Luis Valley: A <br />Remote Sensing Investigation, Dept. of Geology, Colorado School of Mines, 247 p. <br />• HRS Water Consultants, (1987), San Luis Valley Confined Aquifer Study, Phase I, Final Report, <br />rg_task8-1_2001-08.doc 1 of 19 Apri124, 2001 <br />