Laserfiche WebLink
Subtask 8 - Natural Flow DMI Utilities <br />GUNMOD and the MODSIM prototypes developed for th e Gunnison River basin both operate using a data <br />set of stream flows representative of natural conditions. The term na tural flow is synonymous with virgin <br />flow, defined as the flow in the ri ver that would have occurred in the absence of all activity by man, i.e., <br />diversions, return flows, reservoir storage, and im port to and exports from the basin. With a model that <br />starts with a natural flow data set, essentially all of the water rights and structures must be simulated in the <br />model, either explicitly as a demand in the network or as part of an aggregated demand made up of a large <br />number of individual rights of similar priority and lo cation. For the prototype model, natural flows at <br />stream gages and natural inflows to the network structure were ported directly from the GUNMOD model <br />(INFLOW.DBF files). The inflow data set used in GUNMOD was developed by the USBR and was <br />adopted for use in the basin. <br />For future CRDSS river basins, a DMI utility was de veloped that will produce natural streamflows and <br />inflows in accordance with the same general procedur es utilized by the USBR. Natural flows are estimated <br />by starting with recorded hi storical flow data and adjusting them for upstream man-made depletions. The <br />DMI utilities developed for natural flow estimate s are summarized in Task Memorandum 1.15-15, DMI <br />Utility to Estimate Natural Streamflow at USGS Gage Stations, and Task Memorandum 1.15-16, DMI <br />Utility to Estimate Natural Streamflow and Inflow at Network Model Nodes. <br />Subtask 9 - Water Rights Aggregation <br />In order to account for all water rights in the basin, th e MODSIM prototype represents the majority of the <br />water rights in the basin as "aggregated" water rights, which are grouped according to ten priority classes <br />and by relative location in the basin. For the prototype , the aggregation of water rights (sorted by priority <br />classes and by location) was ported directly from GUNMOD. The GUNMOD aggregations were not <br />checked in detail to verify accuracy. However, there were a few instances in which the GUNMOD <br />aggregations were modified, based on additional info rmation about water rights gained through interviews <br />with the Division Engineer and water users. These modifications were principally in the Crystal Creek-Iron <br />Creek-Smith Fork area. <br />For future CRDSS river basins, a DMI utility was developed that will access the CRDSS water rights <br />database, sort and group the water right structures according to decree amount and Administration Number, <br />and convert the data to input formats required by the water rights planning model. Aggregated water rights <br />will be assigned a weighted Administration Number for use in the model. This DMI utility is described in <br />Task Memorandum 1.15-13, Water Rights DMI Utility. <br />Subtask 10 - Return Flows <br />MODSIM must account for the amount, timing, and locati on of return flows from irrigation in order to <br />properly reflect the availability of water for diversi on by downstream structures. The amount of irrigation <br />return flows is estimated by multiplying the diversion from the river by the factor of one minus the system <br />efficiency. The timing of the return flows is prescr ibed by an input file indicating the amount of return flow <br />that accrues to the river in the same time step a nd in succeeding time steps due to the lagged effect of <br />groundwater return flows. It is also necessary to id entify the locations in the network at which irrigation <br />return flows will occur. For the prototype model in the Gunnison River basin, the system efficiency values, <br />return patterns, and location of returns (network nodes) were ported directly from GUNMOD <br />(SEASONAL.TXT and CRAMOUT.TXT file). For most of the basin, system efficiencies were assumed to <br />be 30 percent, (resulting in 70 percent return fl ow). An exception was the irrigation under the <br />6 <br />A 275 .01.09.95 1.15-26 Fosha <br />