My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CRDSS_Task1-5_VariableEfficiencyEvaluation_Compare
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
CRDSS_Task1-5_VariableEfficiencyEvaluation_Compare
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2011 8:31:55 AM
Creation date
7/10/2008 2:15:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
CRDSS Task 1.5 - Variable Efficiency Evaluation - Compare StateMod Variable Efficiency and Soil Moisture Accounting Historic Model Results to Previous CRDSS Model Results and Historic Measurements
Description
The purpose of this task was to run the monthly Historic Yampa River Basin model with the irrigation requirement file (*.ddc) created in Task 1.2 and the baseflows developed in Task 1.3.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
11/5/2001
DSS Category
Surface Water
DSS
Colorado River
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Contract/PO #
C153933, C154062
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
SB92-87, HB93-1273, SB94-029, HB95-1155, SB96-153, HB97-008
Prepared By
Leonard Rice Engineering
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
years hit the maximum efficiency limit, therefore, to a lesser degree average years are also a <br />potential problem. <br />Another potential issue with aggregate structures occurs due to estimating efficiencies based on <br />overall basin averages. The calculated efficiencies for most of the structures in Water District 54 <br />are at the 60 percent maximum. However, the overall basin monthly efficiencies used to <br />estimate the "estimated" aggregates diversions range from 19 to 48 percent during the irrigation <br />season. Therefore, it may be more appropriate to estimate aggregate diversions using <br />efficiencies determined by water district. <br />Figure 6 shows measured Previous CRDSS, and Enhanced analysis diversions from 1976 <br />through 1997 for the Slater Creek Aggregate Diversion. As shown, in many years, late season <br />simulated diversions are zero when there are still "estimated" diversions. The zeros estimated by <br />the Enhanced model are probably more representative of what occurred even though they do not <br />calibrate as was well as the Previous CRDSS model. Figure 7 shows a scatter plot for the Slater <br />Creek Aggregate Diversion. <br />Figure 6 <br />Slater Creek Aggregate Diversion - 54_ADY022 <br />Previous CRDSS Historic Simulation and Enhanced Simulation <br />3500 <br />3000 <br />~; 2500 <br />N <br />N <br />v 2000 <br />R <br />c <br />.~ <br />~ 1500 <br />L <br />~_ <br />~ 1000 <br />500 <br />1976 1978 <br />1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 <br />1996 <br />Gaged Previous CRDSS - - -Enhanced <br />VariableEff Taskl-5 9 of 17 November 5, 2001 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.