My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CRDSS_Task1-3_VariableEfficiencyEvaluation_Run
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
CRDSS_Task1-3_VariableEfficiencyEvaluation_Run
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2011 8:31:55 AM
Creation date
7/10/2008 2:05:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
CRDSS Task 1.3 - Variable Efficiency Evaluation - Run StateMod to Create Baseflows using the Variable Efficiency and Soil Moisture Control
Description
The purpose of this task was to develop baseflows for use in subsequent StateMod simulations using the StateMod’s enhanced variable efficiency and soil moisture accounting algorithm.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
8/6/2001
DSS Category
Surface Water
DSS
Colorado River
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Contract/PO #
C153933, C154062
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
SB92-87, HB93-1273, SB94-029, HB95-1155, SB96-153, HB97-008
Prepared By
Leonard Rice Engineering
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Conclusions <br />As shown in Table 1, in most cases the baseflows calculated using the variable efficiency and <br />soil moisture accounting algorithm have a lower annual flow than the original baseflow <br />calculations. This means that on the average for these reaches, less diverted water is consumed <br />and more water is returning to the river. StateMod does not currently produce a report showing <br />estimated soil storage during the baseflow calculation. However, water is not withdrawn from <br />the soil reservoir during baseflow simulation to satisfy irrigation water requirement, it is <br />withdrawn only to satisfy a headgate demand. Therefore, during baseflows simulation, the soil <br />moisture is likely having an unmeasurable effect on the results. <br />The baseflow locations higher in the watershed, with relatively few upstream irrigation <br />diversions, show the smallest decreases in baseflows and in some cases, such as the Elk River at <br />Clark gage; included in Table 1, show an increase in baseflows. This particular gage has fewer <br />than 12 small diversions upstream. The slight increase in baseflows likely reflects the relative <br />abundance of water on that tributary, and the irrigation practice of diverting water based on <br />availability not necessarily on crop needs. The consumptive use analysis further confirms this, <br />with estimates of average annual shortages in that drainage of around 6 percent, which is lower <br />than other tributaries of the Yampa River. <br />The difference in baseflows calculated during the CRDSS efforts and the new baseflows <br />calculated using the variable efficiency and soil moisture accounting algorithm are, on the <br />average, not significant. However, in months when supplies are more abundant or short, the <br />differences are important. These months are generally the critical months for investigating the <br />potential for future supplies or the effects of low flows on endangered species. Because the new <br />baseflows more accurately account for water use and common irrigation practices in the Yampa <br />River Basin, they are recommended to be used in subsequent model simulations. <br />Comments and Concerns <br />None. <br />L:ASecrion Folders\SECD\Carolyn\CDSS\VariableEff Taskl-3.doc 12 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.