My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SPDSS_Task1_Research-ID-StudyPeriod
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
SPDSS_Task1_Research-ID-StudyPeriod
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2011 8:36:12 AM
Creation date
7/8/2008 1:02:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
SPDSS Task 1 - Research and Identify Appropriate Study Period
Description
The objective of this task was to verify or refine the recommended study period as follows: 1. Review the availability and reliability of digitized data required for the development of DSS components; 2. Determine that the period includes wet, dry, and average periods; represents the long-term average hydrology of the basin; and allows for cost-effective modeling efforts; 3. Document study periods used in other modeling efforts in the South Platte Basin.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
10/26/2003
DSS Category
Surface Water
DSS
South Platte
Basin
South Platte
Contract/PO #
C153954
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
SB01-157, HB02-1152, SB03-110, HB04-1221, SB05-084, HB06-1313, SB07-122
Prepared By
Leonard Rice Engineering
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The following supporting information supports the selection of the indicator stations, <br />based on the criteria defined above. <br />• The Cherry Creek near Franktown gage (06712000) was selected to represent <br />Water District 8. Diversions upstream from the Cherry Creek near Franktown <br />gage station for irrigation purposes are minimal and therefore considered <br />insignificant to the overall flow. <br />• The North Platte River near Northgate (06620000) was selected to represent <br />Water District 47, and to a lesser degree, Water Districts 48 and 76. This gage <br />includes effects from some upstream diversions, but is the only long-term gage in <br />the North Platte River basin. There are no gages with records spanning the study <br />period on the Laramie River (Water District 48) or on Sand Creek (Water District <br />76). <br />• The North Fork South Platte River below Geneva Creek at Grant (06706000), <br />which was replaced by the North Fork South Platte River at Grant, station <br />PLAGRACO in 1991, was selected to represent Water Districts 23, 80, and 9. <br />The location is 1.3 miles downstream of Roberts Tunnel; therefore, Roberts <br />Tunnel diversions were subtracted out of the overall flow to evaluate conditions at <br />this station without the influence of transbasin diversions. No other significant <br />diversions or storage influence this gage. <br />• The Middle Boulder Creek at Nederland gage (06725500) was selected to <br />represent Water Districts 5, 6, and 7. No significant diversions or storage <br />influence this gage. <br />• The Big Thompson River at Mouth of Canyon near Drake gage (06738000) was <br />selected to represent Water District 4. Water delivered from the Colorado-Big <br />Thompson project is re-diverted, along with some native inflow, above this gage. <br />However, the station is believed to provide adequate representation of overall <br />conditions within the basin. <br />• The Cache La Poudre River at Mouth of Canyon near Fort Collins (06752000) <br />was selected to represent Water District 3. This gage is affected by both storage <br />and transbasin diversions, however, it is the only long-term gage on the Poudre <br />River and, therefore, was considered in the analysis. <br />• The South Platte River at Julesburg (06764000) was selected to represent <br />conditions in the South Platte River before leaving the state of Colorado and <br />flowing into the state of Nebraska. This gage is strongly affected by transbasin <br />diversions, storage, and diversions for irrigation, and was included for comparison <br />only. <br />Each of the seven selected indicator stations was individually evaluated based on annual <br />streamflow and cumulative streamflow over the available period of record through water <br />year 2002. The purpose of the individual evaluation was to determine if the long term <br />average hydrology for the period of record was reflected in the selected study period and <br />that wet, dry, and average periods were evident in the streamgage data. <br />Annual streamflow was plotted for each indicator gage and the long-term average was <br />compared to the 1950 to 2002 average, an example of which is shown on Figure 2. As <br />Page 7 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.