My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RGDSS_Task8-8_HistoricMonthlyModel_BaseflowCheckandSimulationRuns
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
RGDSS_Task8-8_HistoricMonthlyModel_BaseflowCheckandSimulationRuns
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2011 8:35:55 AM
Creation date
7/8/2008 9:11:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
RGDSS Task 8-8 - Phase 1c Historic Monthly Model - Evaluate Baseflows, Verify Model Operation, and Historical Diversion Check Runs and Analysis
Description
Memo documenting Phase 1c baseflow, check and simulation runs.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
9/27/2000
DSS Category
Surface Water
DSS
Rio Grande
Basin
Rio Grande
Contract/PO #
C153863
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
HB98-1189, SB99-173
Prepared By
Leonard Rice Engineering
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
approach and aggregated classes as an aggregated diversion (aggregation is described in a <br />memorandum documenting Task 8.1 of the Surface Water Model development. The capacity of a <br />well structure is the sum of the individual well water right (permit) capacities associated with that <br />structure. <br />Well Return and Depletion Locations <br />As with surface diversion structures, well pumping may result in depletions and/or return flows to <br />a surface stream. The locations and timing of depletions and return flows are described by the <br />Unit Response Functions developed by the Groundwater Contractor. The utility makertn was <br />used to make specific assignments to nodes represented in the surface water model Makertn <br />creates three different files which are used by the DMI watright in the creation of the direct flow <br />station (*.dds) and well station (*.wes) files and describe the location of depletion and return flow <br />impacts within the surface water model network. <br />It should be noted that many of the URF assignments made in the surface water model result in <br />return flows that are less than 100 percent of the unconsumed water. This occurs because <br />portions of water applied to farms percolates into the groundwater aquifer, and is lost with respect <br />the surface water system. Similarly, the deplete effects of pumping may not equal 100 percent of <br />the pumping volume. This situation occurs when a portion the pumpage comes from <br />groundwater storage, or salvage. <br />Historic Groundwater Pumping <br />Historic pumping by groundwater wells for agricultural purposes in the San Luis Valley was <br />estimated by the Consumptive Use Contractor following a process described in the <br />documentation for the State's Consumptive Use Model (StateCU). For all but two modeled <br />diversion structures, historic pumping was estimated by examining the calculated potential <br />consumptive use, historic surface water diversions, conveyance and application losses, and soil <br />moisture conditions. Potential consumptive use not met from surface water supplies and soil <br />moisture was estimated to be supplied from groundwater. Required pumping volumes were then <br />adjusted to reflect application efficiencies. <br />Municipal Well Use <br />Municipal water use was also added to the surface water model during Phase lc model <br />development. There are numerous incorporated towns and cities within the San Luis Valley that <br />provide raw or treated water to their residents for domestic, municipal and industrial purposes. <br />These are predominantly supplied from groundwater pumping systems. Domestic water use <br />outside of city service areas (unincorporated areas) is most commonly supplied by small private <br />groundwater wells. <br />Table 1 illustrates recent populations for 15 of the largest cities and towns in the San Luis Valley <br />as estimated by the Colorado Department of Local Affairs (CDLA). Excluded from the Table are <br />the smaller towns, and unincorporated areas. The total 1997 population of the San Luis Valley, <br />including cities, rural and unincorporated areas has been estimated by the State of Colorado at <br />approximately 45,000 (CDLA). The municipalities shown in Table 1, therefore, represent about <br />one-half of the total Valley population. The populations used to estimate water uses shown in <br />Table 1 have been adjusted to reflect that cities and towns typically provide water service to <br />people living outside of their incorporated city or town limits: reported municipal populations <br />C:Acdss\Task8-8.doc Phase lc Model September 27, 2000 -Page 3 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.