Laserfiche WebLink
was considered. Swing water rights as described by water commissioner in each District are <br />shown in Table 3. <br />Table 3 <br />Swing Water Rights as Reports by Water District Commissioners <br />District Ditch/Priority Administration Amount <br /> Number (cfs) <br />20 Rio Grande Canal 11568.00000 318.14 <br />20 Empire Canal 11910.00000 312.30 <br />21 El Viejo Ditch 6422.00000 14.40 <br />21 McCunniff Ditch 7395.00000 16.60 <br />21 Capulin Ditch 7407.00000 31.37 <br />21 Ortiz Ditch 9266.00000 14.02 <br />21 Hardtack Ditch -North 11392.00000 9.45 <br />21 Hartack Ditch -South 11392.00000 9.00 <br />22 Santiago Ditch 2648.00000 42.00 <br />22 Antonito Ditch 13629.00000 139.00 <br />22 Magote Ditch 13667.00000 342.00 <br />24 San Pedro Ditch 851.00000 19.50 <br />24 San Acacio Ditch 2312.00000 46.00 <br />24 Cerro Ditch 2891.00000 40.00 <br />25 Priority No. 9 7426.00000 60.80 <br />25 Priority No. 51 9252.00000 10.25 <br />25 Priority No. 55 9588.00000 16.00 <br />26 Hearn Ditch 7396.00000 4.20 <br />26 Friese Ditch 7396.00000 2.00 <br />26 Priority No. 19 7780.00000 8.90 <br />26 Priority No. 24 7914.00000 2.20 <br />26 Priority No. 25 8127.00000 4.00 <br />26 Priority No. 32 8218.00000 6.20 <br />26 Priority No. 33 8402.00000 3.80 <br />27 NA NA NA <br />3 5 NA NA NA <br />Based on this information, water right classes were developed and applied to all aggregated direct <br />flow diversion structures in the basin as shown in Table 4. The amount of water rights within <br />each class and for each aggregated diversion structure is shown in Attachment 2. <br />Note that aggregated water right classes were defined differently for aggregated direct flow and <br />storage structures (Task 7.2 -Aggregate Reservoirs and Stock Ponds) because of differences in <br />distributions of water right administration numbers, although the processes used were similar. <br />C:Acdss\Task7-l.doc Water Right Aggregation March 13, 2000 -Page 5 of 6 <br />