My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RGDSS_Task4_RGWCD_Interview
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
RGDSS_Task4_RGWCD_Interview
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2011 8:33:25 AM
Creation date
7/2/2008 9:59:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
RGDSS Task 4 - Basin Interviews
Description
Memo documenting interview with Rio Grande Water Conservation District.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
6/22/1999
DSS Category
Surface Water
DSS
Rio Grande
Basin
Rio Grande
Contract/PO #
C153863
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
HB98-1189, SB99-173
Prepared By
Leonard Rice Engineering
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Closed Basin Project consists of a series of wells, canals, and pipelines that is used to extract <br />water from the shallow aquifer within the Project boundaries without significantly affecting water <br />levels in the unconfined and confined aquifers outside the Project boundaries. The Project was <br />completed in 1992, but is experiencing difficulty with well yields due to an unusual bacterium <br />causing clogging of the well screens. This problem is being addressed by the Bureau of <br />Reclamation and must be resolved before the RGWCD accepts the Project from the Bureau of <br />Reclamation. Currently the Project is yielding a maximum of about 40,000 acre-feet per year. <br />For additional information regarding the Closed Basin Project, see the memorandum titled Closed <br />Basin Proiect Interview. <br />Historical Agricultural Practices <br />In 1963 or 1964, center-pivot sprinkler systems were introduced to the San Luis Valley. Prior to <br />this time the primary irrigation methods were sub-irrigation and flood irrigation, using surface <br />water supplies to recharge the shallow groundwater to the extent that the water levels were raised <br />to the root zone of the crops. Sub-irrigation saturated the soils and caused waterlogging, and <br />some lands in the central portion of the Closed Basin went out of production. Therefore, several <br />drainage districts were established to create to large drainage systems to drain the lands by <br />lowering the water levels. <br />Following the advent of the center pivot sprinkler technology in the Valley, irrigators became <br />much more efficient with their use of water, and the use of sub-irrigation became less and less <br />prevalent. Currently, the general practice of irrigators north of the Rio Grande is to use center- <br />pivot sprinkler systems fed directly by pumping from shallow wells. These wells pump shallow <br />groundwater that is recharged each year from existing surface water diversions. South of the <br />River the general practice is to use center-pivot sprinkler systems fed from on-farm ponds. These <br />ponds are filled either by surface water diversions when available or groundwater pumping. <br />Much of the land south of the River is still flood irrigated. Wild flooding occurs on irrigated <br />meadows and pasture lands in the Basin. <br />Because of the rapid growth in the use of center pivot sprinkler systems the water users in the <br />Closed Basin, in 1981, asked the State Engineer to stop issuing new well permits for the <br />unconfined aquifer within the Closed Basin. In order to keep the water level in the unconfined <br />aquifer at an economic pumping level, the ditch companies' encourage their shareholders to use <br />their surface water for artificial recharge purposes. This is accomplished by constructing <br />recharge pits on the center pivot corners, diking the corners or using the existing drain ditches. <br />Recharge also occurs because of leaky canals and laterals. <br />One would initially think that the loss of acreage in the corners of center pivots would affect crop <br />yields. However, the lost acreage is more than offset by the efficiency and precision of <br />application that center pivot irrigation affords the farmers. In fact, the precise application of <br />irrigation water and pesticides that center pivot technology provides has caused yields to nearly <br />double for many of the locally grown crops (including alfalfa, potatoes, etc.) despite the loss of <br />some irrigated acreage on the corners. <br />At the present time fifteen to twenty additional center pivot sprinklers are being installed each <br />year in the Valley on previously irrigated ground. There are currently about 2,200 center pivot <br />systems in use representing 45 to 55 percent of the irrigated acres in the Valley. The use of center <br />pivot sprinklers started in the 1960's but really accelerated in the 1970's until the State restricted <br />the installation of new wells in the unconfined aquifer. <br />C:Acdss\RGWCD.doc Rio Grande Water Conservation District Interview May 10 -Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.