My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RGDSS_Task4_D35_Interview
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
RGDSS_Task4_D35_Interview
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2011 8:33:25 AM
Creation date
7/2/2008 8:46:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
RGDSS Task 4 - Basin Interviews
Description
Memo documenting interview with District 35 Water Commissioner.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
7/2/1999
DSS Category
Surface Water
DSS
Rio Grande
Basin
Rio Grande
Contract/PO #
C153863
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
HB98-1189, SB99-173
Prepared By
Leonard Rice Engineering
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Much of the losses experienced by the streams, canals and ditches serve to recharge both the <br />confined and unconfined aquifers within the Closed Basin. Return flows may also accrue to the <br />Rio Grande below Alamosa. <br />River Gains and Losses <br />Many of the streams and canals in District 35 have significant seepage losses or gains. In fact a <br />"futile call" situation exists on lower Trinchera Creek below Smith Reservoir during certain times <br />of the year. Lower Trinchera Creek can lose 7-12 cfs below Smith Reservoir. It has, therefore, <br />been stipulated that the Commissioner will only deliver 11 cfs from Smith Reservoir to the <br />Shumaker diversion point when the downstream junior water right is out of priority (otherwise <br />the full 8 cfs of the Seyfried Stribling Ditch is delivered). <br />Ute Creek is generally a gaining stream down to the Ute Creek gage. The Sangre de Cristo <br />stream has high stream losses and beaver dam problems in the vicinity of the Sangre de Cristo <br />gage. Therefore TIC often uses carrier canals to route water around this reach and into Trinchera <br />Creek. The upper reach of Trinchera Creek generally loses water when the flow is less than 5 cfs, <br />but is usually a gaining stream when flows are greater than 5 cfs. <br />Comments and Concerns <br />None <br />Attachments <br />1. Straight Line Diagram <br />2. Water Rights Priority Listing - Trinchera Creek <br />3. Water Rights Priority Listing - Ute Creek <br />4. Water Rights Priority Listing -Sangre De Cristo <br />5. District 35 Structure List <br />C:Acdss\D35_Mem.doc District 35 Interview July 2, 1999 -Page 6 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.