My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RGDSS_Task4_Dist25_Interview
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
RGDSS_Task4_Dist25_Interview
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2011 8:33:25 AM
Creation date
7/2/2008 8:25:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
RGDSS Task 4 - Basin Interviews
Description
Memo documenting interview with District 25 Water Commissioner.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
7/2/1999
DSS Category
Surface Water
DSS
Rio Grande
Basin
Rio Grande
Contract/PO #
C153863
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
HB98-1189, SB99-173
Prepared By
Leonard Rice Engineering
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Kerber Creek <br />Kerber Creek is the largest tributary reaching San Luis Creek. Flows in Kerber commonly peak <br />at over 200 cfs, and typically reach San Luis Creek through mid-June. When flows in Kerber are <br />in excess of 60 cfs, Kerber is considered a free river system. There is a streamflow gauging <br />station on Kerber Creek immediately downstream from the highest diversion point. <br />San Luis Creek <br />San Luis Creek is predominant water supply within District 25. As previously described, only a <br />few of the many small tributaries physically reach San Luis Creek on a regular basis, including <br />Kerber Creek, Rock Creek, Clover Creek, Alder Creek. Water sources reaching San Luis Creek <br />are administered together with San Luis Creek. A futile call is considered to exist on other <br />tributaries, and water rights are administered separately. <br />For water rights administration purposes, San Luis Creek is divided into three reaches. The <br />upper reach extends from Poncha Pass to a point north of Villa Grove at the confluence with <br />Kerber Creek. The middle reach extends from Kerber Creek to County Road 66 (Hot Springs <br />Road), including Kerber Creek rights. The lower reach is below County Road 66, extending <br />down to San Luis Lake. Because of natural gains and losses to the creek, these three reaches are <br />administered somewhat independently. <br />The most senior water rights on the upper reach of San Luis Creek (and tributaries) are owned by <br />the Oxcart Ranch. These rights have a No. 51 priority, and are either on one of the small <br />tributaries or on San Luis Creek and are not effected by a senior call. In addition, San Luis Creek <br />is often dry at a point just upstream from Villa Grove, so calls from downstream rights are <br />considered futile during these times. Priority number 55, for 16 cfs, is another major diversion, <br />and is the number two calling priority. <br />The middle reach of San Luis Creek typically runs year-round. Within the middle reach, the <br />senior priorities are Nos. 2, 3, 14, 16, 30 and 35 on Kerber Creek. However, San Luis Creek <br />typically gains approximately 8 cfs over a five mile reach through the Villa Grove area. This gain <br />often satisfies several other downstream seniors on San Luis Creek such that they do not have to <br />be called out, including the No. 2 priority (Schultz Dittrich Ditch) for 2.1 cfs, the Number 3 <br />priority (Steel Ditch No. 2) for 1.6 cfs, the Number 14 priority (Schultz Dittrich North Ditch) for <br />2.8 cfs, and the Number 16 priority (San Luis Co. Ditch) for 5.9 cfs. <br />The lower reach of San Luis Creek experiences heavy losses, and rarely has live flows all the way <br />to San Luis Lake. Many of the ditches on the lower reach do not have functioning flumes and <br />rarely have a significant divertable supply. <br />The District Commissioner is not aware of diversions structures that have physical capacities that <br />are less than their total decreed water rights. There are, however, several structures in the lower <br />reach that are rarely used and may not be able to sustain flow under their decreed rights. <br />The Commissioners noted that several diversion structures that appear in the State's database are <br />either abandoned or are actually water rights that are carried in other structures. Included are: <br />• Coal Drainage Ditch -abandoned <br />• Keasey Ditch -abandoned <br />• Trujillo Ditch -abandoned <br />• Desert Ditch -abandoned <br />C:Acdss\D25_Mem.doc District 25 Interview July 2, 1999 -Page 6 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.