My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD11755
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1100
>
FLOOD11755
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 10:24:03 AM
Creation date
6/27/2008 2:57:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Guidelines and Specifications for Flood Hazard Mapping Partners - Volume 1: Flood Studies and Mapping
Date
4/1/2003
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ '- <br /> <br />Guidelines and Specifications for Flood Hazard Mapping Partners [April 2003] <br /> <br />1.1.5 <br /> <br />Mapping Partners <br /> <br />[February 2002] <br /> <br />As discussed in the Introduction, Section INT.9 of these Guidelines, several Mapping Partners <br />may be involved in a particular Flood Map Project. The Mapping Partners most frequently <br />include FEMA Regional Office (RO) and Headquarters (HQ) staff; communities or regional <br />agencies, including those participating in the FEMA Cooperating Technical Partners (CTP) <br />Program (hereinafter referred to as CTPs); Study Contractors (SCs) selected by FEMA or the <br />community to perform certain portions of the work; contractors selected by a CTP to perform <br />certain portions of the work; and FEMA's Flood Map Production Coordination Contractors <br />(MCCs). The assigmnent of project tasks to communities, CTPs, SCs, CTP contractors, and <br />MCCs may vary from project to project. These task assignments are made during the Project <br />Scoping phase to allow FEMA and the Project team to achieve a "best value" for its mapping <br />efforts based on the capabilities and resources of the various Mapping Partners. <br /> <br />The bar graphs in Figure 1-2 demonstrate the flexibility in the assignment of Flood Map Project <br />tasks and illustrate how the assignment of responsibilities can vary. <br /> <br />~ <br />... <br />o <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />.. <br />~ :=ou I <br />i _U <br />~:.... .-. . . --.. <br />.I: . <br />... ~ '!II <br />'\', ;~: <br />I".r.. ~ \) I <br />"0 ~. j-.;. <br />. i ~~ .< ! <br />~ ':ftt .: <br /> <br />~ <br />o <br />~ <br />o <br /> <br />~...: ~ I <br />. ;-m 'u . ~ <br />i~'€"D~" <br />~ ~ ~.:::: <br />. . .. "~.~~ ~ ~ .: ~i <br />4.11','. i <br />Ii, :, ~.~ '.' <br />" "I <br />, .' I <br />!' ~', <br /> <br />.---..1" <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />E <br /> <br />Figure 1-2. Possible Distribution of T~sk Assi!~nments for Flood Map Projects <br /> <br />Column A depicts a map update that combines the efforts of the CTP and SC to complete the <br />hydrologic and hydraulic analyses, floodplain mapping, and digital FIRM production, with <br />support from the MCC for upfront research and PreliminarylPost-Preliminary processing. The <br />SC would perform independent QAlQC reviews of the CTP work. <br /> <br />Column B depicts a project with hydrologic and hydraulic analyses, floodplain mapping, and <br />digital FIRM production by the CTP and up front research, ongoing coordination, independent <br />QAlQC reviews, and PreliminarylPost-Preliminary processing by the MCC. <br /> <br />1-7 <br /> <br />Section ],] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.