Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Guidelines and Specifications for Flood Hazard Mapping Partners [April 2003] <br /> <br />1.4 Data Developmentl Report and Map Production <br />[February 2002] <br /> <br /> <br />Tapa & Flood <br />Hazard Data <br />Development <br /> <br />Preliminary I <br />Post-Preliminary <br />Processing <br /> <br />After completion of the Project Scoping phase (covered in Section 1.3 and Appendix I of these <br />Guidelines), including the issuance of the necessary SOWs, MASs, task orders, and/or <br />Cooperative Agreements, the Data Development/Report and Map Production phase of the Flood <br />Map Project begins. This section overviews the data development and FIRM production <br />process. This section primarily focuses on Flood Map Projects that will result in a new or <br />updated FIRM, produced digitally. As noted in Section 1,3, FEMA will produce all new FIRMs <br />digitally, and prefers to produce updated FIRMs digitally. However, the FEMA Lead may direct <br />that an updated FIRM be produced using manual cartographic techniques when cost constraints <br />or other factors so dictate. This decision shall be made during Project Scoping. <br /> <br />A Special Problem Report, or equivalent document providing the same information, is required <br />whenever a significant problem requiring FEMA resolution is encountered or when a significant <br />change in scope, schedule, or budget is necessary. The responsible Mapping Partner shall submit <br />a Special Problem Report to the FEMA Lead immediately following the identification of the <br />Issue. <br /> <br />Figure 1-4 shows the process for data development and production of the FIRM and FIS report. <br />As shown, two parallel "paths" exist for completing the topographic and flood hazard data <br />development and the production of the FIRM and FIS report. To complete a Flood Map Project <br />in a timely and cost-effective manner, it is critical that activities be completed simultaneously <br />where possible and that all Project Team members work collaboratively. As shown in Figure 1-4 <br />on the next page, concurrent activities are the foundation of the Flood Map Project process. <br /> <br />All Flood Map Projects will include a map production component; Flood Map Projects that <br />incorporate new or updated flood hazard data also will include a topographic and flood hazard <br />data development component as well as a provision for independent incremental reviews of these <br />data by a qualified QA/QC reviewer. <br /> <br />Independent Quality Assurance/Quality Control Review <br /> <br />[February 2002] <br /> <br />Each Mapping Partner contributing to a Flood Map Project must ensure that its contributions to <br />the project are in compliance with the standards in these Guidelines as well as any additional <br />standards provided by FEMA in project-related task orders, SOWs or MASs. As shown in <br />Figure 1-4, the flood hazard and topographic data development process requires interim reviews <br />of analyses and products. The independent QA/QC review for each analysis and product must be <br /> <br />1.4.1 <br /> <br />1-55 <br /> <br />Section 1.4 <br />