Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Hi <br /> <br />sm.raction of <br /> <br />E\ CHAX::\EL CAPAClTY <br /> <br />CHA::\ GEt; <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />of melting snow, and even then the flow is only a <br />what it was before di versions for irrigation ,vere made This reduc- <br />tion in flow has resulted in a gradual choking of the channels by <br />sediment and vegetation, until eventual.ly their capacity has become <br />so small that when floods occur the overflow for a gi \Ten flood dis- <br /> <br />is greater than formerly. <br />development of flood-protection measures was of slow growth <br />and passed through four stages: (1) Removal of buildings to higher <br />ground, (2) impro\Tement of river-channel capacity with no clear idea <br />of the capacity required, (3) increase of channel capacity to equal the <br />measured peak flow of the most recent flood, and (4) construction <br />detention reservoirs to protect against the greatest <br />A brief discussion of these stages, in chronologie <br /> <br />charge <br />The <br /> <br />of storage or <br />probable floods <br />order, follows <br /> <br />first settlements were made along the streams, usually <br />the banks, and eneroaehed on the channels of seemingly <br />harmless streams. The outst,anding example of such encroachment <br />was in Denver. There Cherry Creek appeared to be such an inoffen- <br />si ve stream that some of the buildings, by a sort of gentlemen's <br />agreement among. property owners as to a reasonable width of channel, <br />encroached so far on the natural channel that they were supported <br />by stilts in the channel itself. The flood of 1864, which was the <br />first after settlement took place, showed the folly of such procedure' <br />and destroyed many of the encroaching buildings. 'Yhen rebuilt <br />they were placed outside the natural channel. Beyond that, little <br />was done to improve the channels. In Pueblo, similarly, buildings <br />erected as late as the eighties intruded in the na,tural ri vel' channel. <br />Fort Lyon was originally located on low ground close to the Arkansas <br />River, but after the flood of :May 1867 it was relocated 17 miles <br />westward on higher ground. <br />(2) As the various settlements grew, andlatcr floods caused over- <br />flow and resulting damage 'to them, steps were taken to increase <br />the channel capacity, chiefly by raising the bridges or reducing the <br />obstruction of the channel cross section caused by the bridges. But <br />this remedy was haphazard, as the volume of the floods was neither <br />measured nor ('stimated, and witholit such information it was not <br />possible'to know how much the channels should be widened or deep- <br />ciu\d in order to carry the probable volume without overflow. <br />(3) The second stage in channel improvement, and the third in <br />flood protection; consisted in measurement of the peak flow of each <br />outstanding flood as it occurred aIid the subsequent enlm'gement of <br />the <<hannel, if necessary, on the basis of this measured peak, to carry <br />future floods of as large volume.' In Pueblo, where the peak flow of <br />the Hood in ' 1894 was 39,000 second-feet, the chftl1ud th~oligh the <br /> <br />The <br />to <br /> <br />(1) <br />close <br /> <br />J <br />I' <br />... . <br /> <br /> <br />. ,-' <br /> <br />','1 <br />. -,~~ <br />',;$ <br /> <br />The history of floods in Colorado spans the years from the early <br />days of the ninete('nth century, when the only whites in the region <br />were transient traders, trappers, and, travelers, through the middle <br />years of that century, when the early settlers arrived, to the present <br />day. Although severe floods occurred prior to settlement, the <br />evidence indicates that changes in the channels of at least some of <br />the streams subject to Doods have occurred since s(>ttlement b('gan. <br />The gradual de\Telopm(>nt of city flood-protection measures, as <br />experiences \\-ith floods have multiplied and mekorologic and hydro. <br />logic data have accumulated, can be easily traced. <br />Streams subject to severe floods are chiefly those on the ('astern slope <br />of the Rocky )'fountains, those in the plains area, cast of the moun- <br />tains, and those in the Rio Grande and San Juan Basins. 'When <br />settlement began, grent stretches of the plains area rast of the moun- <br />tains were covered with a natural growth of grasses indigenous to <br />the region, and, although varying with the sf'asons, it is believed <br />to ha \'0 bew fairly luxuriant. Tho stock-raising industry developed <br />so rapidly in the region and spread over it so widely as to cause too <br />dose grazing of the grass cover in many places. Thus the protection <br />the grass had afforded the soil from the viblent rains and resulting <br />floods was reduced materially. TlJ,e intensive grazing may have <br />tended also to pack, the soil, and by thus flugmcnting the' run-off, <br />increased the flood discharge in some parts of the area. <br />In some places streams seem to be widening as, the erosion of their <br />banks progresses. "Vhen Trinidad was first settled, about 1860, <br />the Purgatoire River was spanned by a footbridge about 30 feet long. <br />Floods since that time have enlarged the channel until it is now about <br />250 feet wide. The width of Fountain Creek at the town of Fountain <br />was about 40 feet in the nineties but has now increased to 200 feet. <br />Cherry Creek \vithin the present city limits of Den vel' has increased in <br />width from bout 14 to 100 feet sinoe the sixties. ' This process seems <br />to be continuing, and' some, floods so, erode the unprotected banks <br />of the streams that it is necessary to lengthen the bridges spalUling <br /> <br />l.th.Ul,,\1JU <br /> <br />.. CHANNEL CAPACITY AND DEVELOPMENT <br />~ FLOOD-PROTECTION MEASURES <br /> <br />l~\ <br /> <br />~\./U.u;::> <br /> <br />.....J..J <br /> <br />CHAKGES <br /> <br />them. <br />This tendency of streams to widen, at least locally, suggests erosion <br />accelerated by' soine pr~s incident to settlement' of the region bv <br />white people; but':the emnt to which it may beevidenee of greater <br />flood flows has not bc-en demonstrated. " <br />In some places, particUl.arlY in the South Platte and ArkansaS <br />Ri\Tei' Basins, the redudtionofchalUlel capacity has been' incident <br />to the development of irrigation. 'The manylli versions for irrigation <br />have reducedthe.r~ver flow to a mel'etrickle except during the period <br />' " <br />' , <br />