|
<br />Hi
<br />
<br />sm.raction of
<br />
<br />E\ CHAX::\EL CAPAClTY
<br />
<br />CHA::\ GEt;
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />of melting snow, and even then the flow is only a
<br />what it was before di versions for irrigation ,vere made This reduc-
<br />tion in flow has resulted in a gradual choking of the channels by
<br />sediment and vegetation, until eventual.ly their capacity has become
<br />so small that when floods occur the overflow for a gi \Ten flood dis-
<br />
<br />is greater than formerly.
<br />development of flood-protection measures was of slow growth
<br />and passed through four stages: (1) Removal of buildings to higher
<br />ground, (2) impro\Tement of river-channel capacity with no clear idea
<br />of the capacity required, (3) increase of channel capacity to equal the
<br />measured peak flow of the most recent flood, and (4) construction
<br />detention reservoirs to protect against the greatest
<br />A brief discussion of these stages, in chronologie
<br />
<br />charge
<br />The
<br />
<br />of storage or
<br />probable floods
<br />order, follows
<br />
<br />first settlements were made along the streams, usually
<br />the banks, and eneroaehed on the channels of seemingly
<br />harmless streams. The outst,anding example of such encroachment
<br />was in Denver. There Cherry Creek appeared to be such an inoffen-
<br />si ve stream that some of the buildings, by a sort of gentlemen's
<br />agreement among. property owners as to a reasonable width of channel,
<br />encroached so far on the natural channel that they were supported
<br />by stilts in the channel itself. The flood of 1864, which was the
<br />first after settlement took place, showed the folly of such procedure'
<br />and destroyed many of the encroaching buildings. 'Yhen rebuilt
<br />they were placed outside the natural channel. Beyond that, little
<br />was done to improve the channels. In Pueblo, similarly, buildings
<br />erected as late as the eighties intruded in the na,tural ri vel' channel.
<br />Fort Lyon was originally located on low ground close to the Arkansas
<br />River, but after the flood of :May 1867 it was relocated 17 miles
<br />westward on higher ground.
<br />(2) As the various settlements grew, andlatcr floods caused over-
<br />flow and resulting damage 'to them, steps were taken to increase
<br />the channel capacity, chiefly by raising the bridges or reducing the
<br />obstruction of the channel cross section caused by the bridges. But
<br />this remedy was haphazard, as the volume of the floods was neither
<br />measured nor ('stimated, and witholit such information it was not
<br />possible'to know how much the channels should be widened or deep-
<br />ciu\d in order to carry the probable volume without overflow.
<br />(3) The second stage in channel improvement, and the third in
<br />flood protection; consisted in measurement of the peak flow of each
<br />outstanding flood as it occurred aIid the subsequent enlm'gement of
<br />the <<hannel, if necessary, on the basis of this measured peak, to carry
<br />future floods of as large volume.' In Pueblo, where the peak flow of
<br />the Hood in ' 1894 was 39,000 second-feet, the chftl1ud th~oligh the
<br />
<br />The
<br />to
<br />
<br />(1)
<br />close
<br />
<br />J
<br />I'
<br />... .
<br />
<br />
<br />. ,-'
<br />
<br />','1
<br />. -,~~
<br />',;$
<br />
<br />The history of floods in Colorado spans the years from the early
<br />days of the ninete('nth century, when the only whites in the region
<br />were transient traders, trappers, and, travelers, through the middle
<br />years of that century, when the early settlers arrived, to the present
<br />day. Although severe floods occurred prior to settlement, the
<br />evidence indicates that changes in the channels of at least some of
<br />the streams subject to Doods have occurred since s(>ttlement b('gan.
<br />The gradual de\Telopm(>nt of city flood-protection measures, as
<br />experiences \\-ith floods have multiplied and mekorologic and hydro.
<br />logic data have accumulated, can be easily traced.
<br />Streams subject to severe floods are chiefly those on the ('astern slope
<br />of the Rocky )'fountains, those in the plains area, cast of the moun-
<br />tains, and those in the Rio Grande and San Juan Basins. 'When
<br />settlement began, grent stretches of the plains area rast of the moun-
<br />tains were covered with a natural growth of grasses indigenous to
<br />the region, and, although varying with the sf'asons, it is believed
<br />to ha \'0 bew fairly luxuriant. Tho stock-raising industry developed
<br />so rapidly in the region and spread over it so widely as to cause too
<br />dose grazing of the grass cover in many places. Thus the protection
<br />the grass had afforded the soil from the viblent rains and resulting
<br />floods was reduced materially. TlJ,e intensive grazing may have
<br />tended also to pack, the soil, and by thus flugmcnting the' run-off,
<br />increased the flood discharge in some parts of the area.
<br />In some places streams seem to be widening as, the erosion of their
<br />banks progresses. "Vhen Trinidad was first settled, about 1860,
<br />the Purgatoire River was spanned by a footbridge about 30 feet long.
<br />Floods since that time have enlarged the channel until it is now about
<br />250 feet wide. The width of Fountain Creek at the town of Fountain
<br />was about 40 feet in the nineties but has now increased to 200 feet.
<br />Cherry Creek \vithin the present city limits of Den vel' has increased in
<br />width from bout 14 to 100 feet sinoe the sixties. ' This process seems
<br />to be continuing, and' some, floods so, erode the unprotected banks
<br />of the streams that it is necessary to lengthen the bridges spalUling
<br />
<br />l.th.Ul,,\1JU
<br />
<br />.. CHANNEL CAPACITY AND DEVELOPMENT
<br />~ FLOOD-PROTECTION MEASURES
<br />
<br />l~\
<br />
<br />~\./U.u;::>
<br />
<br />.....J..J
<br />
<br />CHAKGES
<br />
<br />them.
<br />This tendency of streams to widen, at least locally, suggests erosion
<br />accelerated by' soine pr~s incident to settlement' of the region bv
<br />white people; but':the emnt to which it may beevidenee of greater
<br />flood flows has not bc-en demonstrated. "
<br />In some places, particUl.arlY in the South Platte and ArkansaS
<br />Ri\Tei' Basins, the redudtionofchalUlel capacity has been' incident
<br />to the development of irrigation. 'The manylli versions for irrigation
<br />have reducedthe.r~ver flow to a mel'etrickle except during the period
<br />' "
<br />' ,
<br />
|