My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Roaring Fork Stream Flow Survey (2)
CWCB
>
Watershed Protection
>
DayForward
>
Roaring Fork Stream Flow Survey (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2010 11:11:05 AM
Creation date
6/19/2008 1:50:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Watershed Protection
Document ID
hr_0006
County
Pitkin
Eagle
Garfield
Gunnison
Stream Name
Roaring Fork River
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Sub-Basin
Roaring Fork 14010004
Water Division
5
Title
Roaring Fork Watershed Stream Flow Survey Project Data Summary
Date
12/13/2004
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
Roaring Fork Conservancy
Watershed Pro - Doc Type
Planning Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. Develop base stream flows by executing StateMod's Base flow Module. <br />5. Simulate the stream system's operation by executing StateMod's Simulation Module. <br />6. Evaluate results and generate grapb~s and tables by executing StateMod's Report Module. <br />7. If desired, add daily simulation capability. <br />(ht~,c„~/icdss.state.~c~.us/ft~r/staterrnocl'.~s~p, StatelVlod Model - 9.96 (2001-08-31}documentation) <br />Another k+~y model output is a characterization of each month of every year from 1.909-1996 as <br />having wet, dry and average conditions. <br />(ft ://~ c~wl~.state.co.us/rdss%roducts/statemod/a ~,go:~s/coloupT~df/co,~aappe;. ~ (page <br />68). <br />Current limitation for our purposes include: 1) its inability to link point, linear, and polygon <br />features kc;yed to a stream layer; 2) the data is reported monthly rather than daily vrhich prohibits <br />calculation of some important hydrologic indices; 3) the current version is not current as it runs <br />through 15-96; and 4) it has limited display capabilities. However, there are future plans to run <br />the mode& through 2003 and report daily data. <br />There is potential to use these gages as part of the extension process, since the datz~-centered <br />approach and baseflow component of State,Mod make the addition of new streamflow data <br />relatively easy (from Page 16 of <br />(~ ://dewr:(tp.state.co.~~slcdss/~aroducts/state:~n®dJ~,~„re~~ts/col~~°~ /col,.cr.~;l~. <br />IHA (~:t3://www.freshwate~-s.or t®cals/~ <br />The Indic~.tors of Hydrologic Alteration (LHA) is a software package that allows h}~droiogists <br />and ecologists to create a statistical description of a daily record of stream flow and to measure <br />changes in this description over time. It is most commonly used with streamfiow data, but the <br />software can be used with any type of daily hydrologic data, including river stages, ground water <br />levels, or lake levels. The IHA was developed by scientists at The Nature Conservancy's <br />Sustainable Waters Program and by Smythe Scientif c Software of Boulder, Colorado. <br />The IHA software calculates a suite of more than 60 ecologically-relevant statistics from a dail~r <br />hydrologic data series. For instance, it calculates the timing and maximum flow of each year's <br />largest flood, then calculates the mean and variance of these values over some decades. If these <br />statistics e~rere changed significantly by, sa`r, dam construction, you can then consider whether <br />the change: matters to the downstream ecosystem. This method is described in the lraper "A <br />Method for Assessing Hydrologic Alteration within Ecosystems," available on their web site <br />The II-IAIA also includes the Range of Variability Approach (RVA) to support ecologically-based <br />manageme-nt of hydrological systems. This method, described in "How Much Water Does A <br />River Need?" helps with the design of adaptive management programs that use the quantified <br />natural variation of a hydrological system as an interim management target. Using the RVA, you <br />can propo~.e a range of variability for each :[HA parameter as a management target and quickly <br />calculate h.ow frequently the system loss meat these goals during the data period. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.