Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />II. HYDROLOGY <br /> <br />Hydrology for the current study, the 1999 & 2001 LOMRs, and the 2005 Removal Action <br />LOMR were developed by the USACE [USACE 1988] and provided the basis for the hydraulic <br />analyses along the Poudre River completed as part of the effective FIS for the City of Fort <br />Collins (March 18, 1996). Results of the 1988 hydrology study have been provided in Appendix <br />A. For the current study reach, the peak discharges reported in the Fort Collins FIS match the <br />results of 1988 hydrology study. The peak discharges for the current study reach have been <br />provided in Table 2.1. <br /> <br />Table 2.1 Cache la Poudre River FIS Hydrology (USACE 1988, FJEMA 1996). <br /> <br />Location Peak Discharge (cfs) <br /> 10-Year 50-Year 100-Year SOO- Year <br />Bluff Line Gage 6,490 11,800 15,100 26,300 <br />Upstream of Dry Creek Confluence 5,370 10,200 13,300 24,100 <br />Downstream of Dry Creek Confluence 6,700 12,700 16,600 30,100 <br /> <br />The hydraulic analyses completed for the Fort Collins FIS, and the various LOMRs <br />utilized more detailed discharge profiles than those reported in the table. In addition to potential <br />inflows to the Cache la Poudre River from Dry Creek, the USACE hydrologic study l::onsidered <br />the attenuation of flood peaks along the river. The detailed results of the USACE study were <br />incorporated into the effective FIS analyses as indicated by the variation in discharge:s given as <br />input to the HEC-2 models. <br />The detailed discharge profiles used in the current study are based on the QT c:ard values <br />in the effective HEC-2 models from the original FIS; these profiles are given in Tablc~ 2.2. The <br />profiles given in Table 2.2 represent the QT card values from the original 1996 FIS HEC-2 files. <br />The Table 2.2 discharges typically represent the total discharges for the river, prior to the <br />consideration of any split flows with the exception of the Vine Drive 500-year split of 1,100 cfs. <br />It should be noted in the 500-year profile at the Linden Street Bridge that 500 cfs is <br />removed from the discharge profile. It is unclear, due to the lack of available documentation, <br />whether this decrease in the 500-year discharge is attributed to in-chmmel attenuation or flow <br />leaving the main chmmel upstream of the bridge. Therefore, based on other discharge reductions <br />in the original profile it is assumed that the 500 cfs removed at Linden Street is a result of <br />attenuation. Similarly, at the B.N.R.R. Bridge 1,100 cfs is removed from the 500-year profile. <br />Based on notes in the 1994 hydraulic model, an offline rating curve determined that 1,100 cfs <br />split from the main channel along the north side of Vine Drive and the B.N.R.R. tracks. The <br />1,100 cfs Vine Drive split was removed from the USACE's 1988 baseline hydrology between <br />RN.R.R. Bridge and Dry Creek prior to determining the QT values in the 1994 hydraulic models <br />for the Cache la Poudre River. <br /> <br />COFC2003-1O Oxbow FINAL LOMR.doc <br /> <br />2.1 <br /> <br />ANdERSON CONsulTiNG ENGiNEERS, INC. <br />