My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SPDSS_Task64_ReviewDevelopPrecipitationRechargeEstimates
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
SPDSS_Task64_ReviewDevelopPrecipitationRechargeEstimates
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2013 9:36:20 AM
Creation date
6/11/2008 2:20:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
SPDSS Task 64 - Review and Develop Precipitation Recharge Estimates
Description
This memorandum presents the general approach used to develop monthly precipitation recharge estimates for both the Denver Basin and South Platte alluvial ground water models.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
5/11/2007
DSS Category
Groundwater
DSS
South Platte
Basin
South Platte
Contract/PO #
C153953
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
SB01-157, HB02-1152, SB03-110, HB04-1221, SB05-084, HB06-1313, SB07-122
Prepared By
Leonard Rice Engineering
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Arkansas River Basin <br />The Hydrological Institutional (HI) model was developed during the Arkansas Basin litigation <br />between Kansas and Colorado. The model primarily covers irrigated areas served by ditch <br />systems. It uses a soil moisture balance approach (described further below) to estimate <br />precipitation recharge over irrigated lands during the irrigation season. Monthly total <br />precipitation is provided from NOAA data. The Bureau of Reclamation effective rainfall method <br />is used to determine the portion of the total precipitation that is effective at meeting crop <br />demands. The remainder (total precipitation -effective precipitation) is estimated as surface <br />water runoff. The effective precipitation, along with irrigation water, is then applied to a <br />consumptive use algorithm with a soil moisture balance approach. After crop demands are met, <br />the remaining portion of the effective precipitation and irrigation water is used to first fill the soil <br />moisture reservoir, and then finally to recharge the aquifer (lagged using unit response curves). <br />According to Dale Straw, because the effective precipitation and irrigation water are not <br />explicitly tracked separately, it is difficult to distinguish the portion of the ground water recharge <br />from precipitation versus applied irrigation water. <br />The model includes both the irrigation and non-irrigation seasons, however a nominal ET <br />requirement is produced during the non-irrigation season. The model also estimates precipitation <br />runoff from ungaged tributaries with non-irrigated lands using a rainfall runoff method that uses <br />a uniform annual distribution of precipitation. <br />Republican River Basin <br />A ground water model of the Republican River Basin was developed as part of the final <br />settlement stipulation in the Kansas v. Nebraska and Colorado litigation. Precipitation recharge <br />to the aquifer was one of several model input variables (also including irrigation recharge from <br />ground water, irrigation recharge from surface water, canal leakage, stream losses, and decrease <br />in storage). <br />The Republican River Basin model spans 19 million acres with average precipitation ranging <br />from approximately 16 inches per year in the western part of the model area (eastern Colorado) <br />to approximately 27 inches per year in the eastern portion. While these numbers represent the <br />averages, certain portions of the study area receive up to approximately 50 inches precipitation <br />per year. The amount of precipitation recharge increases with the amount of total precipitation. <br />There is also a wide range in soil types throughout the model area. Given the same amount of <br />precipitation, more recharge occurs in course versus fine soil types. <br />Multiple precipitation recharge curves (recharge versus total precipitation) were developed to <br />represent the variability in total precipitation and soil type throughout the model area (Figure 3). <br />STATSGO soil maps were used to delineate course, medium, and fine soil classes (i.e. sand, <br />loam, and clay). Two curves were developed for each soil class -one for irrigated lands and the <br />other for non-irrigated lands. To further characterize differences throughout the basin, a unique <br />set of curves were developed for tributary versus Republican River mainstem alluvium. <br />Hydraulic conductivity was the principal terms used in calibrating the ground water model. <br />Minor adjustments were also made to the precipitation recharge curves during the calibration <br />process, therefore it was also considered a calibration term. <br />Task 64.doc 4 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.