My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SPDSS_Task46-2_StreamGainLossEstimates
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
SPDSS_Task46-2_StreamGainLossEstimates
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2013 9:26:27 AM
Creation date
6/11/2008 1:49:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
SPDSS Task 46.2 - Stream Gain/Loss Estimates - Phase 4
Description
This Technical Memorandum summarizes the compilation and analysis of data for the computation of monthly gains and losses for the main stem of the South Platte River and selected tributaries for the study period of 1950-2005.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
4/10/2008
DSS Category
Groundwater
DSS
South Platte
Basin
South Platte
Contract/PO #
C153953
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
SB01-157, HB02-1152, SB03-110, HB04-1221, SB05-084, HB06-1313, SB07-122
Prepared By
CDM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The monthly average baseflow values for the 1999 through 2005 period are displayed <br />graphically in Figures 30 through 39. The baseflow values depict similar trends as discussed <br />above. <br />4.0 Summary and Conclusions <br />This task developed monthly estimates of stream gains and losses due to groundwater, or <br />baseflow, for seven reaches >11 the main stem of the South Platte River and two tributaries, the <br />Cache la Poudre River and Cherry Creek, within the SPDSS study area for the period 1950 to <br />2005. A spreadsheet-based water balance method termed the Pilot Point method was employed <br />in this analysis. This method uses daily data that are constrained and smoothed to estimate <br />baseflow. It was compared to a mass balance method involving average monthly flows without <br />smootll>11g and found to produce more realistic results due to the additional data processing <br />uzvolved. <br />These baseflow results will be used to 11e1p qualitatively calibrate the alluvial groundwater <br />model being developed wider Task 48, by comparing the trends >11 computed to simulated <br />baseflow over time and also by comparing individual baseflow values in a given reach and time <br />period. <br />This task also provides information on the general trends of t11e stream-growldwater system of <br />the reaches analyzed. In general, baseflow is larger in the South Platte River downstream of the <br />Fort Lupton gage but there are no consistent trends amongst the reaches. Seasonal trends, <br />however, were generally depicted >11 all reaches. <br />The monthly baseflow values ranged from reach to reach based on the daily inflows and <br />outflows included in fl1e analysis for each reach. The largest monthly baseflow gains of the <br />reaches typically occurred in July, August and September and indicate a gaiiliilg stream <br />condition. During this time a groundwater gradient is towards the river which would be <br />expected due to an increase >11 groundwater levels typically observed during an irrigation <br />season in the alluvial aquifer of the South Platte River. T11e filming of t11e largest baseflow <br />during the latter portion of the growing season suggests that muc11 of the irrigation-based <br />recharge infiltrates into the alluvial aquifer and returns to file stream quickly, withal a few <br />months. This pattern was not observed in the South Platte 2 -Denver to Henderson reach. <br />Possible reasons for this difference are due to differences in inflows and outflows within each <br />reach, to the amount and location of irrigation occurring within file reach, to the timing of <br />return flows and to well depletions as a result of pumpiizg. <br />5.0 Recommendations <br />Below are recommendations from file activities performed under Task 46: <br />^ Alluvial aquifer parameters used uz the constraints of maximum gauz or loss are <br />representative values for an entire reach of river and should not be applied as localized <br />values within the river reaches. <br />SPDSS Phase 4 Task 46 Technical Memorandum -Final 16 <br />0~4i 10i0~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.