Laserfiche WebLink
An examination of the plotted correlations indicate that El Nino years have a tendency to <br />supply `adequate' (80 % of normal and above) precipitation with very dry springs tied to <br />La Nina years (please see Data Appendix for more information). <br />Table 2. Summary of Apr. -Jun. Precipitation/HCI Relationships (dark `X' indicates a relatively <br />strong relationship and light 'X' indicates a relatively weak relationship) <br />C - Summer Precipitation (July- September) — Sin2le Seasonal Totals <br />Districts 26, 20 and 35 <br />Unfortunately, little useful information was gleaned from this segment of <br />information as the connections between the HCl variables and all three districts were <br />minimal, at best. This factor may show that even in dry years these basins may have some <br />average precipitation production to help overcome water shortages. <br />D - Summer Precipitation — Days with 0.10" or greater (May 1- September 15) <br />Due to data requirements to analyze this variable only two stations in the basin <br />(Alamosa and Great Sand Dunes) met this requirement. An analysis of the values <br />indicates a minimal useful `connection at Great Sand Dunes, on the east side of the <br />valley. However, at Alamosa there was some relationship with the AMO with negative <br />values correlating somewhat well with average /above average days with 0.10" of <br />precipitation or greater and vice versa for negative AMO values. Given the lack of <br />stations to analyze with this data, some caution is offered to using this data as a potential <br />`planning' tool rather than information of note. <br />E — Naturalized Stream flow Volume (April — September) <br />One of the most important factors in the hydrologic cycle that is observed in the <br />state of Colorado is surface water. This section will briefly outline the `resulting' factor <br />of winter snows and spring precipitation and how directly calculated naturalized runoff <br />might be influenced by the HCl variables. Also the temporal aspect of `how' runoff <br />might be influenced by the HCl variables will be discussed. <br />13 <br />PDO <br />MEI <br />SOI <br />Nino 3.4 <br />NAO <br />AMO <br />District 26 <br />X <br />District 20 <br />X <br />X <br />District 35 <br />X <br />X <br />C - Summer Precipitation (July- September) — Sin2le Seasonal Totals <br />Districts 26, 20 and 35 <br />Unfortunately, little useful information was gleaned from this segment of <br />information as the connections between the HCl variables and all three districts were <br />minimal, at best. This factor may show that even in dry years these basins may have some <br />average precipitation production to help overcome water shortages. <br />D - Summer Precipitation — Days with 0.10" or greater (May 1- September 15) <br />Due to data requirements to analyze this variable only two stations in the basin <br />(Alamosa and Great Sand Dunes) met this requirement. An analysis of the values <br />indicates a minimal useful `connection at Great Sand Dunes, on the east side of the <br />valley. However, at Alamosa there was some relationship with the AMO with negative <br />values correlating somewhat well with average /above average days with 0.10" of <br />precipitation or greater and vice versa for negative AMO values. Given the lack of <br />stations to analyze with this data, some caution is offered to using this data as a potential <br />`planning' tool rather than information of note. <br />E — Naturalized Stream flow Volume (April — September) <br />One of the most important factors in the hydrologic cycle that is observed in the <br />state of Colorado is surface water. This section will briefly outline the `resulting' factor <br />of winter snows and spring precipitation and how directly calculated naturalized runoff <br />might be influenced by the HCl variables. Also the temporal aspect of `how' runoff <br />might be influenced by the HCl variables will be discussed. <br />13 <br />